User talk:Tiddly Tom/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Userpage

Done! Hidden comments to let you know where to put your text. ~*Hugs*~ Ariel♥Gold 17:10, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Okay. A couple things: First, not everyone has the same resolution/text size/monitor size, so there's just no possible way you can make it so some people won't have to scroll, that's just inevitable. I run 1600 resolution, 22" widescreen, and I have to scroll on your user page, even if the Tango thing is gone. Don't stress about vertical scrolling, but horizontal scrolling is a bad thing, so that's something to watch for (not a problem for you here). Now, second, the table of contents is either above the image, or to the left. I'd actually suggest moving the TOC to the left side of the page completely, to make it visually balanced. Or, dump it completely, it is a userpage, so maybe a TOC isn't required. Up to you. Finally, I can put the panorama in the center if you want, and make it bigger (and, I'd suggest that you upload a new version of that, and crop the black edges out, if you can't do that, I can if you want me to in Photoshop), and then drop Tangobot stuff under it. Naturally, as the page grows, the layout will change, you can move images around to balance it visually a bit better, etc. Anyway, let me know if you want me to fix the image, and what to do with the TOC. Ariel♥Gold 18:19, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Okay, uploaded a new version, I rotated it CW so it was even, cut out the black stuff, and actually resized it, it was over 4000px in size full res, which is just huge, lol. I cut it down to 2500, but a FI only needs to be 1200, so if you wanted to ever get this to featured status, it would qualify. I centered it, and checked the Cambridge page, looks good. What do you think? Ariel♥Gold 18:50, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for the quick help you provided on my talk page, i found what i was looking for! Erebus Morgaine 17:25, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Your very welcome, anything else I can help you with, feel free to contact me. Tiddly-Tom 18:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

Thanks, Archive 2!
Thank you for your support in my RfA. It was a success, and I look forward to getting started! Hiberniantears 18:00, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

St Faith's School

Some good work, there, Tom! I've done a few more copyedits, as you suggested. Perhaps now the article could do with a few more references. regards, Xn4 20:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

It's all right, the coordinates aren't supposed to display in the infobox, but at the top of the article: see the instructions at Infobox UK school. I also had some trouble with the infobox format, so I've added the coordinates in the {{coor dms}} template. Xn4 21:05, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

BBC Members List

Thanks for doing that - my only gripe - would have preferred the active members to have had their original joined date (like inactive and retired) rather than their renewal (2007) date - putting founder at top of the list (it now looks as tho' there's been a coup!) ...Zir 09:57, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Happy now? :P If you want the times, tell me, but I did not think that they added much. Tiddly-Tom 18:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Yup, purrrrfect - thanks - no, agreed, the times don't add anything...Zir 20:01, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Wow!

I Would like to applaud you on your consistency with getting rid of vandals of this project. Bravo! --Dark Zorro 16:26, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello again

I had found you on the recent changes list undoing a vandalism a while ago before I created an account. So I would check your changes every once in a while then finally I decided to applaud in "person".--Dark Zorro 18:47, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

You Are Awesome!

You are the BEST! My new signature ROCKS! How could I ever pay you back? Well, Thanks again!--DarkZorro 19:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

The Excellent Userpage Award
It seems as if you have a lot of pride in your Userpage. Best one I have seen so far! DarkZorro 19:43, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Please put Stubs on Template Page

Yesterday I posted the following at the wikipedia talk:WikiProject BBC/Templates page that I created. Would someone please put the following with correct Formatting on the Templates Page under Stubs. I tried to do it myself but had to Revert it.

  • BBC-radio-stub-{{tl:BBC-radio-stub}}
  • BBC-tv-stub-{{tl:BBC-tv-stub}}

Could something be done about this? Please reply on my Talk Page Kathleen.wright5 08:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks.I hate Formatting. Kathleen.wright5 08:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

RfA

Dearest Supporter,

Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed unsuccessfully with 39 supports, 15 oppose, and 1 neutral. I would have liked to gain some experience of being an admin, but it wasn't to be. At least I gained some valuable time there and will use my knowledge picked up to my next candidacy. I would like to say once again, thank you for voting and I hope to see you at my next request be it a nomination or self-induced, I hope I don't get as many questions!
Rudget Contributions 09:22, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: WP:BBC

To be honest it's not that much quicker to asses articles using the standard AWB (I think there is a plugin that makes it quicker but I haven't tried it, I think there is also a script about too) but it does make it easy to find and tag articles using the list comparer and the prepend function. I have added you to the approved users list so you can use it, but please read the rules of use first (by editing with AWB you confirm your acceptance of these rules and failure to abide by them will result in your name being removed). There is a user manual if you get stuck, but let me know if I can help. Happy editing! mattbr 17:20, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Removing multiple wikilinks is one of those things that needs judgement applied to it, so getting it to remove them all is not really advisable. For example, multiple links to the same article in the same sentence/paragraph is not advised, whereas the same link at either end of a 100kB article is probably OK. Plus there is piping and linking to headings to take into account, as it may not be apparent (to the reader) the same article is being linked to.
Again cleanup is one of those subjective things, and doing all the automatic things doesn't necessarily mean the article has been cleaned up, eg the refs might be a mess or there is excessive bolding or the Headings Have Capitalised Initial Letters when they shouldn't or there are too many links or too few links or there are too many or too few headings etc etc. They are also mostly minor formatting things that shouldn't really be done without doing something else at the same time. Fixing typos is one of those something elses, and I usually run with the edit summary "Typo fixing and other fixes". Don't forget though that some typo changes it makes are not really typos, eg it may be in a quote that is spelt wrongly, it may not be in English (best to wrap it in a language template such as {{lang|2-digit language code}} (if inline) or {{lang-de}} and variants (if the language name is in front) as AWB doesn't fix typos wrapped in a template (they also set the "language" of the text as read by browsers)) or it may be a name. If it is correcting something it really shouldn't be, such as a common first name, just report it to the typos talk page and one of the people there will remove it from the list.
Sorry that was a bit long, but I hope it helps! mattbr 19:25, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Probably the other general thing is fixing links to disambiguation pages, but it is most useful for doing something specific you want to do to lots of pages, such as adding project banners, adding/removing/changing a category, updating infoboxes, and anything you can do with the find-and-replace feature, and also generating a specific list of articles to work through eg pages that are in Category:A but not in Category:B. You might also find something to do at WP:BOTREQ. If there is something you want to do (within reason), it can probably do it in some way, if not the devs are always open to feature requests. mattbr 19:57, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
For doing typo fixing, it doesn't really matter. I usually pick a page and load the what links here (do pages in different topics so you don't check the same pages all the time) and let it go, do something else until it finds a typo and beeps at me, make any other fixes and save or ignore and then go back to the other thing I was doing and so on. If you want to properly clean up the pages making manual edits as well, then you are definitely in the right place! mattbr 20:52, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes, go to 'General' > 'Preferences', tick 'Flash' and 'Bleep', then on the 'Set options' tab tick 'Skip if no typo fixed' and then start it running and minimise the window, then when it has found a page with a typo to fix, the minimised bar thing at the bottom of the screen will flash and it beeps. mattbr 21:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
The plugin I was thinking of was User:Kingbotk/Plugin, but it appears that is more for tagging rather than assessment. There is an assessment script described at User talk:Outriggr/assessment.js, but I have no idea if or how it works! You might find another if you dig around Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts a bit. mattbr 08:51, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
I use the ListComparer to find articles, just load the contents of Category:WikiProject BBC articles in the List 1 box and then load the articles of another category in the List 2 box, such as BBC television programs, then right click and convert to talk the second list and hit compare. If you then save the Only in List 2 list, these are the talk pages that are not in the WP:BBC cat and therefore not tagged. After closing the ListComparer, you can then load this list back into the main Make List box, add some basic text to the Append/Prepend box (I use {{BBCproject|class = |importance = }}) in the More.. tab and select Prepend, add an edit summary and go! It should then add the empty box to the beginning of the talk page (move it as required), right click in the edit box and view page in browser, view the article and add your assessment into AWB then save. mattbr 21:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Looks like you are suffering from the bug Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Bugs#First lines of edit box not displayed, which appears to be due to the fact I asked for the edit toolbar show/hide preference to be saved in the settings. Sorry! Hopefully this will be fixed in the next release. In the mean time, setting a new settings file might solve the problem. mattbr 22:41, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

AdamStrange

Hi, I still need your help on User talk:AdamStrange. Please see my most recent message. This may have to be escalated to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Thanks in advance. —Viriditas | Talk 08:52, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

BTW, thanks for your help. Adam has agreed (in e-mail) to find better sources. —Viriditas | Talk 01:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Shared IP

Hi Tom,

I tried to opened my talk page without logging to Wikipedia and saw your message regarding vandalism to a food preservation article. The IP,124.157.236.149, you are proposing to ban is a shared IP in Chiang Mai Thailand. I happened to get logged on to that particular number this morning when I logged in on my home computer. Since I am on a six party the vandalism should have come from a home user rather than in internet cafe is they distribute the IP numbers the way I believe they do. However I could not venture to guess how one would find out which particular subscriber. I hope they have stopped. RegardsNYerkes 06:43, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

Thanks very much for supporting my RfA. Unfortunately it wasn't a success, however, I appreciate your support all the same! —— Ryan (talk/contribs) 23:35, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for your two messages on my text page. I'm glad to learn that the problem will be fixed with the next release. Dirac66 01:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

You shouldn`t do that! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.34.219.129 (talk) 10:01, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

My (KWSN's) RFA

Thank you for supporting my recent (and successful!) RfA. It passed at at 55/17/6. Kwsn (Ni!) 01:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

My RFA
Thanks for your support in my recent request for adminship, which was successful. I'll do my best to justify the confidence you've placed in me! Dppowell 23:04, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

RFA Thanks

Click there to open your card! → → →

Wikipedia has a second Carlos admin

Click there to open your card! → → →

Re: Barnstar

Hey, thanks!! What brought this about? Gscshoyru 19:29, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
You beat me to the punch a few times, and I have seen you about. :) Tiddly-Tom 19:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Well thank you then :) Gscshoyru 19:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Click "show" to see my message.

My recent RfA

Thank you for participating in my recent RfA. Although the voting ended at 36/22/5, there was no consensus to promote, and the RfA was unsuccessful. I would like the thank you nonetheless for supporting me during the RfA, and hope that any future RfA’s proceed better than this one did. Again, I thank you for your support. ≈ The Haunted Angel Review Me! 02:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your support

Thanks for your support with respect to my request for adminship, which successfully closed today with a count of 47 support, 1 oppose. If you ever see me doing anything that makes you less than pleased that you supported my request, I hope to hear about it from you. See you around Wikipedia! Accounting4Taste 05:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Walter Bread

Good job salvaging that one. Keep it up. DS 13:56, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Well, I had just deleted - for the second time - the article that he had created on the company's website. Then I checked his contribs... DS 16:13, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Admin coaching

Hello – I'd like to know if you're still interested in admin coaching. If you are, I'd be happy to take you onto Krakatoa with me. I've looked over your contributions and your interests, and I think we'd be a good fit together.

I've been an admin since June 2007, my RFA passed unanimously, and using them had a huge learning curve for me. I've made a bunch of stupid mistakes had many learning opportunities since getting my own mop, and I'd like to help someone who wants to walk on the janitorial path. I'm American, I'm pretty sure that I'm old enough to be your way, way, way older sister, and although I only have one user-interest-type userbox, we share a few common interests.

Anyway, let me know at your convenience. It might be fun. :-) Thanks – KrakatoaKatie 06:05, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Great! In all honesty, I did look at the editors "ahead" of you, but several were pretty inactive due to exams or other real life issues, a couple weren't experienced enough, one was going through RFA and is now going through the ArbCom elections, and there were one or two that I believe are here for social networking reasons instead of building the encyclopedia. I think you are taking the same general track I took and have a similar editing philosophy. I'm pretty thorough when I investigate things – I once spent 7 hours researching and reconsidering a 'delete' !vote I gave on an AFD, but that doesn't mean I'm picky or anything. Just diligent.
I've never coached a prospective admin. However, I'm an RN, so I'm a teacher by profession, only I teach patients instead of formal students. I'm an critical care nurse, I've taught certified first responders, emergency medical technicians, and paramedics, and I was a BLS instructor-trainer and an ACLS instructor for several years. For what it's worth, (not much), several of my students have told me I was the best teacher they ever had. I'm pretty good at teaching, and I've taught everyone from oil company CEOs to chemical engineers who hold more than 100 US patents to secretaries to janitors to people who still have outdoor plumbing. I can handle you, buster. ;-) As you will see, I don't take this too seriously while taking it pretty seriously, and I like to have fun. Taking Wikipedia too seriously is why people leave the project in tears. We're not going to do that.
So, here we go – make a coaching subpage titled something like User:Tiddly Tom/Admin coaching or whatever you want to call it, and we'll work there. You could start with a simple paragraph or two about why you want the mop. There are about 1,300 admins and just as many reasons why we chose to trade a lovely pad and pen for janitorial tools, and I'd like to hear your reasons. I do have email enabled, and I'm the one who lately has been handling the autoblocked requests to register new accounts on unblock-en. Let me know when your coaching subpage is ready, and we'll be off like a herd of turtles! :-) KrakatoaKatie 05:30, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

GlassCobra's RfA

My RFA
Hey Tom! Thanks a lot for your support in my request for adminship, which ended with 61 supports, 3 opposes, and 1 neutral. I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified, and please feel free to call on me if you ever need any help or opinions! GlassCobra 01:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

combining footnotes into the reference section on Ida of Lorraine

Thanks for looking at the barebones article of Ida of Lorraine. However, I'm terribly confused why the footnote section was combined with the Reference/Bibliography section. Was this an auto-change that you didn't see? I was following layout examples from other pages and combining the two section ruins any clarity of reading it. LMK. I'm a newbee.  :) Kenalynn 17:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

left you a reply on mytalk page. BTW, does that automatically tell you I did? I'm getting confused on when messages are being triggered. Sometimes, I see messages. Then, pages that I THOUGHT I was watching, don't tell me I received an answer.  ????? Kenalynn 18:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for my latest Barnstar!

And you raise an interesting point - we're all beating each other to the punch. When the update rate is low and only one user is using an efficient anti-vandalism tool, things work well. When the update rate goes over 200/minute and there are several of us clicking away as hard as we can, we're tripping over each other and yet there is still scope for vandalism to get through undetected. I think the time may be coming when we will need tools that allow the work to be divvied up among a team. Philip Trueman 10:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

My (Remember the dot)'s RfA

I never thanked you for participating in my RfA a couple of weeks ago. Thank you for your support, though unfortunately the request was closed as "no consensus". I plan to run again at a later time, and I hope you will support me again then.

Thanks again! —Remember the dot (talk) 06:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Hi

Would you mind telling me what you use to revert so many vandalism edits?! Your talk page appears to be very popular :PTiddly-Tom 19:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Software that I have written myself; the speed, however, is likely more a factor of the speed of my internet connection than of anything else – Gurch 19:08, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
You ever thought of releasing for other editor (like VandalProof for example)? My connection is not great :P Tiddly-Tom 19:12, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
It isn't really functional enough for general use – Gurch 19:12, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Ok then, keep up the great work ;) You keep going without a big wikibreak for a few months and I would be happy to nominate you for adminship. I think you would have a cracking chance now, but give it a few months and you should have no problems. Tiddly-Tom 19:22, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
You really think so? Oh dear. You know, I really wish people would at least do some sort of minimal examination of a contributor's background before they say such things. No offense intended, but it just makes you look silly. Had you perhaps checked here, you would have been led here and then here, and finally here, at which point you would probably have thought to check here, and seen that in the context of all that, your offer means very little – Gurch 19:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Most people do not have such a complicated past as your self, you have to agree? I did do as you describe a "minimal examination of a contributor's background " before leaving the above, now struck out message in good faith. This does not appear to be the case with your above reply. I checked your user logs and noticed you had not blocked anyone recently, then checked a edit count tool which made it seem like you had only been editing in full for a few months. This made me happy enough that I should leave the above message. I am sorry if I have touched on a sensitive topic for you. Tiddly-Tom 19:42, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Odd. Your counting script must be broken; if you have a look at my contributions you'll see that I started editing in December 2005 and made, for example, about 8000 edits in March 2006, which I think can be called "editing in full". That's 20 months ago. Altogether I have about 79,000 edits; are you getting something different? If so, I suggest you use a different script, or perhaps actually look at users' history yourself rather than relying on a machine to do it for you in future – Gurch 19:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes, You are correct. I used this - and I know it only shows a maximum of 45,000 edits, but I did not realise that it would make out you started editing months after you did. You have to agree with me that it would have been a tedious task to go through all the pages of your user contribs though. I also would have read your user page if it was not just a redirect to your talk page. I apologize for my misunderstanding. Tiddly-Tom 19:56, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Good point. I shall adjust my userpage accordingly. Thanks – Gurch 19:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Friendly

Hey there dark, looks like you are getting along well. I noticed on your talk page that you like to welcome new users. May I suggest Friendly to you? I have just started using it in conjunction with the new user log. Take a look at it and feel free to contact me with any more questions. Tiddly-Tom 20:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

I have saved my monobook thing and hit ctrl-f5 and nothing seems to have happened on the monobook page i see what i copied in the dashed outline what did i do wrong? P.s i'll be out for a while:) --DarkZorro 20:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Firstly, what browser are you using? If it is firefox, press ctrl+shift+r. Go to a user talk page, and see if a tag labeled 'welcome' appears to the right of 'edit this page'. If you click on it, it will bring up a menu from which you can select a welcome. Fell free to test it on my talk page. Tiddly-Tom 20:53, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Hi; thanks for your support to my RfA, which closed successfully at (51/1/2). I'll keep this brief since I don't like spamming anyone: I'll work hard to deserve the trust you placed in me. Thanks again. — Coren (talk) 23:36, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm Ibrmrn3000

Hi Tom. I really appreciate your fast response. I would ideally like to get rid of this account to prevent further mixups, but if the best that can be done is to make my user and talk page here redirect to my real/active account (Ibrmrn3000), then so be it. In the future I'll be contacting you through Ibrmrn3000.

Cheers!

Mrnmibrc (talk) 03:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Advise on Charles Plymell article

Dear Tom. I was wondering if you know how to edit an inserted aquaintance's account of Plymell. His editing doesn't seem to integrate with the article. Pjt48 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 17:01, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

wikibreak!!

Thanks Tom. I really appreciate it. What exactly is the purpose for this wikibreak thing I've activated anyhow? While I'm at it, what's monobook.js for? Ibrmrn (talk) 20:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello from a newly registered user ...

Hello Tiddly Tom, I'm a long time fan of Wikipedia, and I have always enjoyed editing and adding to pages for years, albeit anonymously. I kind of regret not having been a registered user earlier - I'm proud of what I've contributed! The reason that I'm sending you this message is to explain to you that I just edited a page, and I looked at the history and clicked on my supposed ISP address, and was dismayed to see that someone with the same ISP number as me has repeatedly vandalised Wikipedia. This is what inspired me to register. Can you tell me, I thought that ISP numbers were individual computer's numbers? I didn't realise that my ISP (and yep, that's them) controlled one's ISP number. And I wanted to let someone know that I don't vandalise Wikipedia - and maybe get this ISP address thing a little clearer?

Regards to you, Aus Chia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aus Chia (talk • contribs) 14:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, Tiddly Tom!

Thanks very much, Tom - much appreciated! Aus Chia (talk) 02:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Re:Vatican edit

Tiddly Tom, I apologize for the Vatican edit. Unfortunately I did not properly log out of a public computer so I am unsure as to who used my account to make that edit. I am sorry if it caused any offense. Thank you for the notice.

Sincerely, Haydn4tet —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haydn4tet (talk • contribs) 17:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

JavaScript Tools

[[WP::-)|Friendly]]

I usually use Internet explorer 7 which doesn't work with Friendly but, during the day on week days I use Mozilla Firefox. I will have to use Friendly during the day. Thank you! ~ DarkZorro 18:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Friendly is based on TW, so it might work well enough. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 22:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

TW

Hey Tom! I downloaded TW. One question, how do i find vandalism (if i do)? --DarkZorro 20:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Lupin's Anti

I just finished my first vandalism revert using Lupin's on John Perrot! Thanks, DarkZorro 17:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

New Page Patroller

I have replied to your query at User talk:TheJosh/Scripts/New Page Patroller. --TheJosh 05:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Illegible superscripts from AWB edit

Hi When you use AWB, could you refrain from reformatting superscripts? For example in your edit of Lanthanide contraction at 14:30 27 October 2007, you replaced 3 by a tiny illegible 3, which I could only read by increasing my screen text size to maximum. I later reverted this manually to 3. Yes, the source code is now longer, but the article is legible which is more important. Another alternative would be to have AWB insert a much larger 3. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dirac66 (talk • contribs)

Thanks!

My RFA
Thanks for participating in my request for adminship, which ended with 56 supports, one oppose, and one neutral. I hope to accomplish beyond what is expected of me and work to help those that lent me their trust. east.718 at 02:23, 11/4/2007

Wikipedia has a new administrator!

Thanks!
Thank you for voicing your opinion in my RfA, which passed with 54 supports, 2 opposes and 3 neutrals. Thanks for your support, I really appreciate it. I hope to exceed expectations, If you have any advice please feel free to let me know. Thanks again!. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤

Thankz

thanks 4 sending me that e-mail I am Jasmine a skool gurl doing a project 4 school looking up HERNANDO CORTES! If you have any infomation please let me know THANKZ!!!!!!

thanks for the barnstar!

It's my first one...Image:Wink.png

sorry!

Sorry, TW informed you automatically. :( —aitias •discussion• 19:28, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Stop it!

Actually, I'm just going home for my dinner anyway, so I will. Many thanks for the star. Best wishes. Philip Trueman (talk) 20:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

I'm very touched, thank you very much for the barnstar! Let's get back to work! Bobo. 19:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Re:BBC Television stubs

I'm sorting out the BBC television stubs from the rest of the UK television stubs so there's not much point in assessing them as well because they will be in the stubs category. Kathleen.wright5 23:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Careful with the anonymous edit histories

They slipped one right past you.Kww (talk) 19:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks Tom :) Happy editing, Snowolf How can I help? 19:47, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

~*Yooo hoooo*~

Ariel♥Gold gives you a huge smile, Just because!
Smiles promote WikiLove, and hopefully hers has made your day better! ({{subst:smile}})

Ariel♥Gold 09:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

In case you didn't see, I did reply on my talk page, and suggested a new modified code for you. Your code had a stray odd - character in it, plus used length you didn't need, so I modified it. Let me know if it works. I'm off to bed, night night Tom! Ariel♥Gold 21:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

FL(some restrictions apply) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Don't overdo it on the fudge!

Spread the Holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaminglawyer/MerryChristmas!}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you also for your kind message :) How did you come across me may I ask? Tiddly-Tom 22:55, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
I came across you by (on a spur-of-the-moment basis after I had the idea to create my own Merry Christmas template) clicking the Random page button on the Main page, then going to its talk page. You happened to be on one of those pages. By the way, I like your username; its more creative than most of the users that I've seen. And please, feel free to send this holiday greeting to anyone you want. It spreads the cheer (limited as it may be on the Internet) FL(some restrictions apply) 04:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

My Searching Helpme Request

Thank you for your thoughts on the searching. I appreciate the kindness. I'm not familiar with the autowikibrowser and what it does (or its requirements). -Gwguffey (talk) 06:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the help with my userboxes, i've been trying for awhile to move it on the left-side but it wouldn't, if you want to respond feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. SKYNET X7000 (talk) 19:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Hills Road College

It wasn't me (or anyone else on this IP address) who edited this entry. Baffling. Glasgowappin

Thanks for your message. Would you be able to provide me with the IP in question? Thank you. Tiddly-Tom 22:00, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Would it be the IP of the router or the computer? Glasgowappin
A link to the page on which I left the message would be ideal. Don't forget to sign your posts with ~~~~ to produce your name and time of message as follows: Tiddly-Tom 22:12, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Alan Carr Page - 1st January 2008

Currently, people are editing the page on Gay Comedian Alan Carr by mentioning stuff about Chris Moyles etc. due to current show on Radio 1 reliving the best moments of Chris Moyles Show 2007. - DJ MeXsTa

Thanks for the heads up. I'm listening as well. Scott Mills has done it before and the article was vandalized about 150 times! Tiddly-Tom 17:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Alan Carr

I didn't do any "tests" on the Alan Carr page - I was removing the vandalism.

Sorry, I have removed the message from your talk page. I was trying to stop the vandals from continuing ASAP. Please accept my apologies. Tiddly-Tom 17:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Reverted edit

You just messaged me to say that my edit to a page had been reverted or removed. However, on the page in question all I did was clean some vandalism. Please make sure you haven't accidental reverted the page to the vandalised version!Thanks. 91.105.190.214 (talk) 17:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your message, I have replied to your talk page. Sorry! Tiddly-Tom 17:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

My Freind Typed It Not Me

oh screw it why am I typing I geuss I'm bored. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeldafan112 (talk • contribs) 17:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Hahahaha

howd you know it was me on the rickinghall page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oldnaledi (talk • contribs) 13:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Magic! Using page histories, a log of every edit to a page is stored there along with who made it and when. Tiddly-Tom 13:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)