User talk:Tibetibet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to the Wikipedia

Here are some links I thought useful:

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. Wikipedia:About, Wikipedia:Help desk, and Wikipedia:Village pump are also a place to go for answers to general questions. To read up on the latest wikinews, have a look at the Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost.

You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be bold!



(Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 17:36, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Spam links

Please do not put unrelevant links on pages. The organization you work for is surely noble but this is encyclopedia and not link farm. Pavel Vozenilek 18:37, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Better way: create one page with information about individual countries and put it in Wikipedia. Such article would be for sure welcomed, relevant and targeted. Pavel Vozenilek 18:50, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Re: International Freedom of Expression Exchange

Okay, no worries. In future, particularly when making edits as an anon, it would be good if you used edit summaries because it can be difficult to tell the difference between legitimate edits and vandalism or politically/commercially motivated edits. Thanks for letting me know. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 05:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Hong Kong Journalists Association

Hi. You should not be using the page to put every single piece of information that already exists on your website. Otherwise, you are just copying from one site to another. Wikipedia is not supposed to be used as a carbon copy. Tibetibet (Talk) 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brad Will external links

Hi. I removed your external link to the story from IFEX. I explain the rationale here, on the article's Talk page. If you come across more reaction to the killing -- and not just news bulletins -- please include it in the "Reaction and reportage" section. Thanks. Alcarillo 18:22, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Special Rapporteur

Your recent edit to Special Rapporteur (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 06:08, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] bolding

Bolding is used within articles to signal the title of the article, as well as the page titles that redirect to that article. Please do not embolden words that are not redirects, as you did at Special Court for Sierra Leone. - BanyanTree 22:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for great edits

Thanks for the great edits on the Right Livelihood Award, been meaning to finish what I started and you did, creating many useful links. FYI, countries of origin don't need to be linked the 2nd, 3rd, 4th times they are mentioned in one article; usually the first time is enough. Now we just need to create articles for those that are redlinked. Or find the articles that exist - as you have done - under variant names. Why don't you create a user page? Bruxism 06:13, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

User pages just let people know a little about you. I like them because if you suspect POV, you can see where the author is coming from ideologically and factor for that. And if you're Tibetan, I'd like to know more about you anyway. Bruxism 07:14, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip. I'm not Tibetan but I've visited Tibet. Probably one of the best trips of my life. 19 February 2007

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:ARTICLE 19 bigger logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ARTICLE 19 bigger logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:06, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Human Rights Watch banner.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Human Rights Watch banner.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:25, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reebok Human Rights Award

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Reebok Human Rights Award, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.reebok.com/Static/global/initiatives/rights/text-only/awards. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 16:54, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] PEN/Open Book cat

Hi Tibetibet -- Just FYI, I added that Category:Freedom of expression organizations category to PEN/Open Book because it previously had the tag Category:Freedom of expression. I agree that it was a little questionable, but left it on because I thought perhaps, like other PEN orgs, it had a freedom of expression mission. --Lquilter (talk) 00:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Index-on-censorship.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Index-on-censorship.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CPJ.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CPJ.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:IFLA.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IFLA.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:IPI logo blue.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:IPI logo blue.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of International PEN

An editor has nominated International PEN, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International PEN and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AMARC new logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AMARC new logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:ACHPR logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:ACHPR logo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:59, 21 April 2008 (UTC)