User talk:Thundrplaya

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles, as you did with 1995 nebraska. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

  1. Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
  2. Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. dcandeto 22:58, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Thundrplaya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! AUTiger ʃ talk/work 21:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject College Football

I've noticed your interest in college football, particularly Nebraska and would like to invite you to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject College football where you'll find many like-minded people looking expand coverage of the sport here on Wikipedia. You'll also find guidelines and formats that members of the project have developed and reached some consensus on that should be used to provide consistency in college football articles. Particularly you may find the Yearly team pages format helpful for the Cornhuskers 2007 season article you have worked on. I hope you join and participate in the project. Good luck. AUTiger ʃ talk/work 21:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Daniel Bruce

A tag has been placed on Daniel Bruce, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Daniel Bruce may actually be notable enough to warrant an article, but I don't know enough about him to determine that. Metropolitan90 03:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Daniel Bruce. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --Metropolitan90 03:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Brandon Buckman

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Brandon Buckman, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Metropolitan90 03:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Joba Chamberlain

A tag has been placed on Joba Chamberlain, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eggishorn 04:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] New Nebraska categories

Per WP:MOS, the categories you created should renamed for the positions aren't capitalized (as with Category:American football defensive tackles). Therefore, for example, one category should be Category:Nebraska Cornhuskers offensive guards. Then, you should make all of these subcategories of Category:Nebraska Cornhuskers football players, not of Category:Nebraska Cornhuskers football. You can then put the unpopulated categories up for deletion at WP:CFD. Pats1 00:59, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Brett Jensen

A tag has been placed on Brett Jensen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Clamster 01:28, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Jeff Leise

A tag has been placed on Jeff Leise, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix 20:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Project Husker

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Project Husker, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. – Swid (talk | edits) 20:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Project Husker

I've nominated Project Husker, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Project Husker satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Husker and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Project Husker during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. – Swid (talk | edits) 18:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 2007 Nebraska football pages

Hi, I've noticed you've done some significant work on getting this year's Nebraska team page up. If you want good examples for how to design and add to these pages, both USC and Texas Wikipedians have done good jobs on individual team pages. Examples at 2007 Texas Longhorn football team (their 2005 team page reached GA status) and 2007 USC Trojans football team (mostly my work). If I can offer advice, let me know. --Bobak 20:48, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nebraska Cornhuskers quarterbacks by year

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Nebraska Cornhuskers quarterbacks by year, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Johnny Dorn

A tag has been placed on Johnny Dorn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lordjeff06 (talk) 19:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Will Bolt

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Will Bolt, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Will Bolt. Jfire (talk) 20:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Nebraska Cornhuskers Baseball Players

I have nominated Nebraska Cornhuskers Baseball Players, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nebraska Cornhuskers Baseball Players. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Jfire (talk) 02:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed deletion of Steve Edlefsen

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Steve Edlefsen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Wizardman 00:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)