User talk:Thunderbunny
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Please accept this invite to join the new WikiProject MTSU, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Articles related to Middle Tennessee State University. Simply click here to accept! –Pomte 01:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC) |
Contents |
[edit] Warhol Museum
You may or may not remember this edit from some time ago. Do you have a citation for it? I want to use it in Campbell's Soup Cans. TonyTheTiger 15:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- A Google search for "warhol largest museum" yields quite a few relevant results, but I'm not sure how Wikiworthy they are. Sorry if I wasn't much help. Thunderbunny 07:34, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- Thanks. I will go with what I have found. I was hoping you might have something better. TonyTheTiger 17:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Donnie Davies
Just thought I'd let you know that I nominated the article for a deletion reversal which you can weigh in on here: WP:DRV Thanks! SquatGoblin 04:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wyoming Incident
Thanks. That is some creepy stuff, but I am interested in it. Let me know if you find anything else. Thanks again. --Rajah 04:34, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Wild. It'll be interesting to check that blog tomorrow. Peace. --Rajah 04:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- You seem to have an interest in the subject; why are you so hot to delete it all of a sudden? RMc 12:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Because the article sucks and, due to the lack of external sources, isn't going to get much better. A bad article that spreads confusion, speculation, and misinformation is worse than no article. Thunderbunny 15:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- "Because Thunderbunny thinks the article sucks"...ahh, that's a good reason to delete something. Did you even bother to read the article? It doesn't spread "confusion, speculation, and misinformation," as you so prissily put it; it's all researched with plenty of external sources. It's hardly the most important article on Wiki, but it doesn't deserve your jihad against it, either. Get a life. RMc 02:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- If by "plenty of external sources" you mean "absolutely none at all", then yes, I agree with you. Thunderbunny 03:36, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- "Because Thunderbunny thinks the article sucks"...ahh, that's a good reason to delete something. Did you even bother to read the article? It doesn't spread "confusion, speculation, and misinformation," as you so prissily put it; it's all researched with plenty of external sources. It's hardly the most important article on Wiki, but it doesn't deserve your jihad against it, either. Get a life. RMc 02:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Because the article sucks and, due to the lack of external sources, isn't going to get much better. A bad article that spreads confusion, speculation, and misinformation is worse than no article. Thunderbunny 15:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- You seem to have an interest in the subject; why are you so hot to delete it all of a sudden? RMc 12:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Where the top is
It's at the other end. ☺ Uncle G 09:31, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Center of Population
Nicely done! Feel free to use the table I set up for that! And don't forget to include refs. I seem to recall going to each place and adding a sentence about it being the CoP, but I don't know if that info is still there. I think I also went to each state page and added something. In any case - very nicely done! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 12:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
