Talk:Thursday (1998 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

[edit] WTF

This is the worst article Ive ever seen

I agree, this article was written in the form of a fan site. --Spikeleefan 09:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC) |B-Class-1=no |B-Class-2=yes |B-Class-3=yes |B-Class-4=no |B-Class-5=yes

It's awful, I agree. I don't understand why the critique is the first part of the article. Would anyone object to that being moved down and some positive critiques being added?69.1.116.33 22:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Dontinsertnamehere 23:08, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Also, I'm looking over all the reveiws I can find. "Many critics" doesn't seem to be accurate in the slightest.Dontinsertnamehere 23:08, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

I moved the Ebert piece down under Critic's Response. I've seen some postive commentary, I'm just not sure how to work it in.Dontinsertnamehere 23:16, 16 October 2007 (UTC)