Talk:Threadless
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] VC?
Anything about this? http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=179989
[edit] LUElinks, B-Rex
LUElinks does not exist. However big a controversy B-Rex was, it has no place on Wikipedia where we do not exist. This edit doesn't even exist. 68.149.27.46 01:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- stop looking for us. cos we don't exist.--JohnDoyle 13:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Referrer spam
I've added notes to the URL links. When reverting these pathetic spammers in future, please report them to Threadless. We wouldn't want the site's good name to be tarnished by a few sneaky idiots. Chris Cunningham 01:21, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Threadlesslogo.gif
Image:Threadlesslogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reworded 'crowd sourced' paragraph
Previously the paragraph said that t-shirts were not open sourced, and then went on to explain what the right term was. I thought it would be more 'to the point' and factual-sounding to say what the right term is, and then go on to explain why 'open source' is wrong. --Pipedreambomb 17:28, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] What is the relevance of the 'crowd sourced' section?
It doesn't actually add value to the article. Please remove. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.108.31.34 (talk) 22:44, 19 November 2007 (UTC)