From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the English Wikipedia discussion page assigned to Thomas H. Larsen. Please assume good faith, remain neutral, and stay civil; if everyone abides by this code of conduct, discussions will be more fruitful.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, current.
I will generally continue discussion where our conversation started. Thus, if I posted on your talk page first, I will usually continue discussion there; if you posted on this page first, I will usually continue discussion here; and if either of us posted on another page first, I will usually continue discussion there.
Start a new discussion.
Note: At this time, I am not very active on Wikipedia, typically editing for only one or two hours per week. Therefore, I may take four or more days to respond to your messages. I apologise for any inconvenience this may cause, and I hope to resume active editing within a reasonable time frame.
[edit] Apologies if I've brushed up against WP:POINT re: User:Lurker
This one article has become painful for me to watch silently. There's just no logical sense to how the subject has been developed. Sorry for drawing unnecessary energy away from more worthy tasks, and thanks. BusterD 02:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that I do not currently have the time to monitor articles myself, butI hope you manage to get something worked out. -- Thomas H. Larsen 04:51, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Warwick Vandalism ?
Hi I am curious to know how you identified the edit you reverted in Warwick as vandalism it appears to be alink of historical value thanks Matt
[edit] Signpost updated for August 13th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 21:18, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for August 20th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:11, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for August 27th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:17, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] You're back!
I'm glad to see you editing Wikipedia again. Cheers! +A.0u 00:55, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for September 3rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 06:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for September 10th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 21:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for September 17th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:00, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:51, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding edits to WP:RFA
Regarding your edit here. Please do not strike thru other folks comments. It seems disruptive. Thank you, Mercury 00:53, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- It is an action of bad faith for one user to attack another on RfA, which is an official and formal process, without providing a valid reason. Additionally, your comment "... seems disruptive" is not based on Wikipedia official policy. Cheers, — Thomas H. Larsen 03:35, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- Uh, no it's not. You see the link "Voice your opinion"? I'm voicing my opinion. And doing what you did is considered very rude. --Maxim(talk) (contributions) 22:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Do not continue this argument further. — Thomas H. Larsen 04:36, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for your comments
Hi, thanks for commenting on my rfa, I have replied here. --Hdt83 Chat 06:22, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for October 22nd, 2007.
Sorry for the tardiness in sending the Signpost this week. --Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for October 29th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Thank you for voicing your opinions in my recent RFA which unfortunately did not pass at (47/23/5). I will be sure to take the advice the community has given me and wait till someone nominates me next time as well as improve my editing skills. Have a great day(or night)! --Hdt83 Chat 05:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry your RfA did not pass. Best wishes and I hope you succeed next time. — Thomas H. Larsen 03:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
