User talk:ThomasPaine123
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi Fahrenheit451. Why shouldn't I think that ThomasPaine123 and you are the same person? I am confused, so don't take it personal. Misou 05:42, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
For one, I think you are violating WP:AGF, and for two, there is no evidence to that effect whatsoever.--Fahrenheit451 22:44, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- I am assuming good faith, I am asking you (not reporting you to checkuser). But this SPA here - ThomasPaine123 - did nothing but vote on an AfD (last minute before it was closed) and you were the one creating its user page as well as moving around its vote on the AfD. Seems very "puppy" to me so that's why I am asking. Never mind. Misou 23:51, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Misou, it is clear that you are violating WP:AGF. You did it twice on this page-and I do mind. Here are your violating quotes: "Why shouldn't I think that ThomasPaine123 and you are the same person?" "Seems very "puppy" to me so that's why I am asking." If you have a problem with the way ThomasPaine123 voted, then you should take it up with this user and leave me out of your false accusations.--Fahrenheit451 00:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- I could not care less what TP123 voted. End of story. Misou 01:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- Contrary facts. You stated, "ThomasPaine123 - did nothing but vote on an AfD (last minute before it was closed)". Either one or both your statements are false. Which is it?--Fahrenheit451 01:30, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Paineful... Misou 03:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- Look. Both of you can have your argument but leave me out. If you want to take up the Office of Special Affairs of Scientology (OSA) as being the prime mover behind all the upsets I will be glad to go there. Probably if one tracked the IP addresses back to the individuals against the posting of a page about altered tech, then found those individual's connection with OSA, there would be enough evidence to include conspiracy to cover up fraudulent advertising. The altered changes in content in the Scientology materials no longer contain the change information that could be seen in the beginnings of all HCOBs and HCOPLs when Hubbard was alive. I assume that since this way of documenting changes lasted through his lifetime that he strongly approved of this method. That method has now disappeared. To say that this is following Hubbard's directions is fraudulent. So simply post the documents of the Scientology corporations that documents Hubbard's approval of no longer stating what changes were made in the original materials. ThomasPaine123 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Misou, as someone who has edited Scientology articles along the 451 guy for two years now, I can assure you that he and Mr.Paine are not the same person. Mr. Paine puts some degree of thought into his remarks and seems eloquent and level-headed. In other words, everything that 451's postings lack. wikipediatrix 00:48, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hum, hum... Level-headed, you say. Rather supercilious, his Painship, in his expressions he is. But OK, F451 is not that classy, I agree. Misou 04:54, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Misou, as someone who has edited Scientology articles along the 451 guy for two years now, I can assure you that he and Mr.Paine are not the same person. Mr. Paine puts some degree of thought into his remarks and seems eloquent and level-headed. In other words, everything that 451's postings lack. wikipediatrix 00:48, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Look. Both of you can have your argument but leave me out. If you want to take up the Office of Special Affairs of Scientology (OSA) as being the prime mover behind all the upsets I will be glad to go there. Probably if one tracked the IP addresses back to the individuals against the posting of a page about altered tech, then found those individual's connection with OSA, there would be enough evidence to include conspiracy to cover up fraudulent advertising. The altered changes in content in the Scientology materials no longer contain the change information that could be seen in the beginnings of all HCOBs and HCOPLs when Hubbard was alive. I assume that since this way of documenting changes lasted through his lifetime that he strongly approved of this method. That method has now disappeared. To say that this is following Hubbard's directions is fraudulent. So simply post the documents of the Scientology corporations that documents Hubbard's approval of no longer stating what changes were made in the original materials. ThomasPaine123 30 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- Wikipediatrix is at it again. Just another violation of WP:CIVIL.--Fahrenheit451 00:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Variant texts in Scientology doctrine
Aside from "game over", I didn't see any reason given why you chose to revert my edit. I can discuss at length why my edit is superior to Fahrenheit451's, who has given little or no meaningful responses to my queries. See the talk page. wikipediatrix 02:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
