User talk:ThomasInd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Speedy deletion of Thomas ind

A tag has been placed on Thomas ind requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KevinCuddeback (talk) 21:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Thomas Ind. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Because Wikipedia strives for a NPOV (Neutral Point of View) in all articles, it is generally in appropriate for users to create their own entry. Beyond this, Wikipedia requires that people be particularly notable (as demonstrated in neutral sources) and provided references for that notabililty KevinCuddeback (talk) 21:06, 19 May 2008 (UTC)