From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard. |
| This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
| WikiProject Biography (Rated B-Class) |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. |
|
|
| B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] |
|
|
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group. |
| More information about this article... |
|
|
|
The following comments have been left for this page:
This is just plain stupid. The death of Wikipedia, in my eyes. Everyone knows that Torbjørn Jagland is not a pedophile, however clumsy and perhaps a bit naive (some would say stupid) he may be as a politician.
I dunno if I'm respecting any guidelines by submitting this, but those guys who posted this stupid article about Torbjørn Jagland certainly disrespects the intelligence and honesty of ordinary people. (edit)
|
|
| WikiProject Politics (Rated B-Class) |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, an attempt to improve, organise and standardise Wikipedia's articles in the area of politics. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
|
| Mid |
This article is on a subject of Mid-importance in Politics. |
|
Article Grading: The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters: (edit · refresh)
This is just plain stupid. The death of Wikipedia, in my eyes. Everyone knows that Torbjørn Jagland is not a pedophile, however clumsy and perhaps a bit naive (some would say stupid) he may be as a politician. I dunno if I'm respecting any guidelines by submitting this, but those guys who posted this stupid article about Torbjørn Jagland certainly disrespects the intelligence and honesty of ordinary people.
|
|
 This article has an assessment summary page. |
[edit] Source doesn't support articles claim
Irishpunktom, please quote from the article and point out to me where he compares islamophobia to Nazism of the 1930s. Otherwise, stop reverting. -- Karl Meier 16:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cabinet
Can I suggest that we set up separate articles for the cabinets of various prime ministers? This gives us an opportunity to write about the events and legacies of these cabinets as well. --Leifern 23:28, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Such pages now exist. Cabinet Jagland. Punkmorten (talk) 15:39, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] NRK news
This article is currently on the frontpage of nrk.no (Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation): http://nrk.no/nyheter/1.3364975
A few minutes ago, this article claimed Jagland was a pedophile. Appearantly, wikipedia vandalism is frontpage-news worthy. Here is a translation of what Odd Erik Stende, Norwegian Labour Partys representative, had to say about it: - We will take any step necessary to remove this.
Any step except editing the goddamn wikipedia page, it seems, as this was up until a few minutes ago. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.48.55.71 (talk) 16:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- I have semiprotected the article for 48 hours. That should stop the recent vandalism to the article. Rettetast 18:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- I still think we need better sourcing for the AUF scandal, especially since it seems to implicate Jagland and Stoltenberg somehow. --Leifern 18:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- I moved the section here per WP:BLP. Rettetast 18:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Since no one has expressed interest in the section I have removed it. See the history. Rettetast (talk) 16:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Insignificant information
Shouldn't we simply leave out the replacements for his seat in the Storting during his tenures as Prime Minister? __meco (talk) 08:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
