Talk:Thomas W. Sneddon Jr.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead.

	This article is within the scope of the Michael Jackson WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Michael Jackson and associated groups or individuals. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project's importance scale.
	After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's ratings summary page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.

Minor update following Jackson verdict.

• this page seems somewhat biased against Thomas Sneddon. Not that I disagree with anything , but there has to be at least something positive to say on his behalf. Quazywabbit 03:08, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Specifically, referring to his "grudge" as if it were an established fact, not having any citations, and not dealing substantively with the manner of prosecution contribute to its non-neutrality. I have no opinion on the case, only on the manner of presentation here. GMcGath 15:53, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

• this page also unfairly criticizes Michael Jackson for the song D.S. which no one even knows for certain was based on sneddon. Why is that not important? Why is sneddon's material important? I think THAT IS HYPOCRACY. --Paaerduag 08:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)