Talk:Thomas Viaduct

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Trains Portal DYK April 10, 2006 This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale within the Trains WikiProject.

	Thomas Viaduct is part of WikiProject Maryland, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Maryland.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.

[edit] Picture of obelisk monument?

If anyone has a "clean" picture of the obelisk mounment, please consider adding it to the article. Sadly, in the HAER image it is covered with graffiti -- which hopefully has since been cleaned off.[1] — Eoghanacht ^talk 17:00, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Yes it has been cleaned, belive it was done it the late or mid 80's, but no i do not have a phot tof it. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 05:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Y Done Found a free to use trainweb picture clean and sharp. --Dp67 | QSO | Sandbox | UBX's 23:54, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Page Freshening.

I grew up in this area and spent quite a bit of time in Ellicott City, Elkridge, Relay and especially Patapsco State Park. (All of them.) I have always loved this bridge. I have been working on fixing up this page over the past few days. Anyone have any grief in changing its format? Most of everything else is the same except for a few added facts, broken things up into sections and the timeline is edited to flow smoothly together instead of afterthoughts. A few other minor changes as well.. Are there any grievances to a complete overhaul?

--Dp67 | QSO | Sandbox | UBX's 16:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC)