Talk:Thomas Barnett

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.
This article is supported by the Military work group.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Wisconsin. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
If you give this article a rating or change a previous rating, please leave a short summary in the comments to explain the rating and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.


[edit] End of History

Barnett's line of thinking is very much an economically focused intellectual extension of Francis Fukuyama's The End of History? thesis, published in the international affairs journal The National Interest in 1989, and later being expanded into a book in 1992.

Really now. He doesn't sound that way to me at all?

Roadrunner 22:22, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

In this presentation, the first book he mentions is 'The End of History and the Last Man'. — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 10:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Does Not Work

His ideas don't work. Since globalization has increased, conflicts certainly must have decreased if they would work. Instead, conflicts have increased as they always did since 1945. See http://www.hiik.de/konfliktbarometer/index.html.en. He may or may not know this. In any case, this leaves him clearly on the financial side of the coin, or even on the financial war side, if you prefer. --Rwst 18:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)