Talk:Thomas, Bishop of Finland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Thomas, Bishop of Finland has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on May 31, 2007.
June 12, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a WikiProject related to the nation of Finland. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(comments)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, which collaborates on articles related to the Roman Catholic Church. To participate, edit this article or visit the project page for details.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project's importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the Norse people, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Successful good article nomination

I am glad to say that this article which was nominated for good article status has succeeded. This is how the article, as of June 30, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass – but I think some further improvements could be made to the prose regarding the image captions and the sentence concerning who was to oversee Bp. Thomas’ resignation.
2. Factually accurate?: Pass – accurate as far as I can ascertain.
3. Broad in coverage?: Pass – topic seems to suffer from a lack of historical information which is no one’s fault, but the addition of possible misidentifications of Bishop Thomas is a nice fature.
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass – no problems here.
5. Article stability? Neutral – Flurry of activity prior to nomination, but stable since that time.
6. Images?: Pass – no problems of which I am aware.

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status. — jackturner3 13:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Title

Come on! "Bishop Thomas"? I think this needs some disambiguation. Srnec 15:02, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

He is just known as "Bishop Thomas" (piispa Tuomas) in all sources. Changing that to "Bishop Thomas of Finland" is naturally possible, if other Bishop Thomas' are to appear in Wikipedia. --Drieakko 15:52, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
I think "Thomas, Bishop of Finland" is preferred Wikipedia form. There are already other bishops named Thomas on Wikipedia, e.g. two named Thomas Bek. Srnec 17:15, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Yes, quite right. Doing the move right now. --Drieakko 06:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)