Talk:Thierry Ehrmann
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-12-18. The result of the discussion was No consensus. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
||
Thanx Woodshed, those stub cats are much purdier than what I'd done. --Jade 05:38, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Spam
Maybe we should add some information about Artprice's history of trawling servers and web sites for email addresses to add to their rather extensive UBE mailing lists?
Well I'd say that the vast majority of what I've contributed here is incontrovertible, so until I see any decent edits I'm going to have to keep my mouth shut.
That, and the fact that I just don't really care any more. If you're happy to see spam dollars spent on this totally obnoxious exercise in faux-art, then i encourage you to join the discussion.
P.S. My references to UBE are not directly linked, so you're still welcome to try and sue me. Trust me - i have a counter-claim.
Ah stuff it the UBE links are getting enforced and are undeniable
[edit] An Update
Well it seems that the majority of the profile that I originally wrote is still intact - maybe our French editor (who is Thierry's P.A.) doesn't understand the subtleties of what I originally wrote. However, the original references to UBE have been removed, and I intend to restore them.
Fact of the matter is that I may be biased - because I still own server logs which can demonstrate serveur.com trolling for email addresses - but Jmey has a conflict of interest. That's a little stronger than a bias.
Can't believe noone cares about the source and use of the image. Is it beneficial to the subject?
cb --
[edit] Speedy Deletion
I can accept that some... or one... may take issue with my expansion of this article. It started from nothing.
It's a stymied, rather useless article and I take exception with the fact that you may dispute my assertions without listing them.
Please list your complaints according to listing criteria so that I can counter them...
I also take great issue with the assertion that i'm promoting this guy... turning the page into an advertorial...
Whereas I'm actually trying to raise a debate.
cb
-- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dingcb (talk • contribs) 14:44, 18 December 2006 (UTC).
[edit] dingcb credibility
dingcb is not a neutral editor.Here is the kind of email messages he sent to us.
vs'etes trop cons.now they want to delete him from wikipedia entirely: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thierry_Ehrmann isn't it your job to maintain his profile? let's get this straight: your boss is a fucking criminal, a leech who sucks money out of other people's initiative. question is, are you for deletion, or contre? je suis pour. i would hate to see him leave any sort of legacy. joyeux noel, j'vous emmerde. ta mere.cb
Pure hate by phone and emails.--Jmey 14:37, 25 December 2006 (UTC)jmey
Jmey is not neutral either. She works for Ehrmann and has failed to disclose this. I've made my position very clear. This guy used to spam the hell out of me, and a lot of other people, on the record. It's not like I have a conflict of interest: I gave him a glowing report. However, this entry ("dingcb credibility") has a very tenuous hold on legitimacy in terms of maintaining a place on this discussion page. It's a personal attack on a contributor which has nothing to do with the current content of this article.--dingcb 02:08, 3 January 2007 (AEST)
