User talk:Theramin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
(Slightly late, but welcome anyway) FlowerpotmaN·(t) 01:48, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Medici villas
--BorgQueen (talk) 17:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Talking statues of Rome
I really think you should consider merging these five articles into the talking statues article. It makes sense that a reader would want to read about them all in one article, I found it quite annoying personally having to click my way through each one just to read another paragraph, and I'm sure I wouldn't be the only one. Gatoclass (talk) 14:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Triumphal Arch (woodcut)
--BorgQueen (talk) 03:15, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] First Congress of Vienna
--BorgQueen (talk) 15:32, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hans Springinklee
--BorgQueen (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Villa Medicea del Trebbio
I added your Villa Medicea del Trebbio to the next update. It will be on Main Page DYK in a few hours. --BorgQueen (talk) 21:33, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- I was just about to "tick" it when BorgQueen added it to the next update. Thanks for jumping through all the hoops. I know it's frustrating, as I've been there on several occasions myself. Alas, what is "common knowledge" to some won't be common knowledge to everyone - as DYK tends to avoid statements of the blindingly obvious (as they "lack interest") then citations are required each time for consistency. Regards, BencherliteTalk 21:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you both, but it all seems such pointless rules-lawyerly box-ticking. The hook is an entirely uncontroversial point (and, indeed, widely known in the relevant field), and about half of the other sentences in the article could have exactly the same footnote, so why pick this one out?
Anyway, that is my Wikipedia time for another day spent advocating for my old articles rather than writing new ones. Perhaps the Villa Medici in Fiesole or Villa Medicea di Poggio a Caiano next. -- Theramin (talk) 21:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
--Maxim(talk) 23:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry you didn't like the request for the cite, but we do have rules and if we start making exceptions pretty soon the whole system breaks down. If it's any consolation you are perfectly welcome to remove the cite once the article is off the front page. The cite is basically only there to help reviewers confirm the hook statement and for readers who might be interested in verifying the claim for themselves. Regards, Gatoclass (talk) 04:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)