User talk:Theprominence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page List of Philippine television ratings for 2008 do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblogspot\.com' . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 01:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to List of Philippine television ratings for 2008. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblogspot\.com' . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 01:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of DLC Film Industry

A tag has been placed on DLC Film Industry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 03:51, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added a {{hangon}} template to an article, DLC Film Industry. In order for an administrator to evaluate whether the article should be speedy deleted or not, we request that you provide a reasoning of why it should remain on the article's talk page. Thank you. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 03:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with DLC Film Industry. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 03:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of DLC Film Industry

A tag has been placed on DLC Film Industry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 08:01, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Philippine Celebrity Titles

A tag has been placed on Philippine Celebrity Titles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. nneonneo talk 23:52, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Page move vandalism

This is your only warning.
The next time you move a page maliciously, as you did to Yasmien Kurdi, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ward3001 (talk) 00:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] List of Philippine television ratings for 2008

Why do you keep on removing/replacing the Mega Manila section? --Howard the Duck 10:53, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Philippine Television Ratings

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Philippine Television Ratings, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: List of Philippine television ratings for 2008. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:53, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

What is your issue with List of Philippine television ratings for 2008? You can just have a daily ratings log here. If you'd want, you can start a blog to place all of that stuff there. --Howard the Duck 11:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
If you keep up all of these nonsensical edits, you will be reported at may even be blocked/banned. --Howard the Duck 11:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:Howard the Duck

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User:Howard the Duck, you will be blocked from editing. --Howard the Duck 11:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 11:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Theprominence". The reason given for Theprominence's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

  • Decline reason:

No, this is a direct username block. Undoing an autoblock won't unblock it. Declined. — MBisanz talk 05:55, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Perhaps, I had contributed on some parts of the Philippine Television Ratings, but then again another user blocks the data that I placed, specifically, the latest Mega Manila Ratings released this year. I placed it because the chart on mega manila was incomplete, late, non-comprehensive and very unclear. So I edited it with the data I gathered from PEP and Tagpuan. But still, the user continues to battle with me in editing the article. All I want to publish the exact and clear data for the readers of this site, but I was blocked then."

Decline reason: "You haven't addressed your behaviour here. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 09:28, 19 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Adding the unblock granted template won't do anything. An admin must review the block, then unblock you, then add the template. If you try to "unblock" yourself again, I will protect the page to stop you from abusing the template. MBisanz talk 09:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "We are sorry for the incident when one of the costumers was vandalizing your site, as a result he was then blacklisted on our shop. Please accept this request for the rest of our costumers in the computer shop. We sincerely apologize, we will do our best to stop the occurrence of this incident again. THANK YOU."

Decline reason: "When you put it that way, no. Role accounts, that is, accounts that are used by many people, are forbidden on all Wikimedia projects without the express consent of the Wikimedia Foundation. Unless you can guarantee that this account is being used by one person, and only one person has access to the password, this account will not be unblocked. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 22:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Theprominence". The reason given for Theprominence's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

  • Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- Yamla (talk) 22:19, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I did the moving of pages because the user, Howard the Duck was formerly moving my reliable articles into different unrelated pages, causing me to be annoyed and worn out. The user, Howard the Duck, has some unclear information on his article, so I edited it, but then again, he replaced it again with the ambiguous data."

Decline reason: "That doesn't justify your vandalism. You should discuss things with users rather than attack them. You also have not mentioned anything in regards to the use of this account as a role account as mentioned above. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 22:27, 19 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am the owner of the computer shop where the vandalism was done, and we report to Wikipedia that an 18 year old mentally challenged boy, named George Kevin S. Cruz has been continually vandalizing articles in Wikipedia until he was blocked. We apologize for this matter, and we cannot explain precisely what he really did because of his situation. We are sincerely promising that this issue won't happen again. We are hoping for your consideration, because our customers need Wikipedia. Thank You."

Decline reason: "I'm sorry. Accounts must be controlled by one person unless they have prior approval from the Foundation. Shared accounts are not permitted. Your customers can edit anonymously, without being logged into this account. The autoblock that is on your IP address will clear itself within a few days of the last login of this account. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 01:02, 20 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Your customers need Wikipedia, right? The only things they need there are its contents. Although one IP is blocked, you and your customers may still continue browsing the whole site (and IPs not yet blocked can be used for editing). Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 17:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC)