User talk:Theperfectone
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] License tagging for Image:Chuck Taylor Crop.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chuck Taylor Crop.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Pro Wrestling
To avoid being regulated by amateur boards, which involve drug testing and the bouts not being pre-arranged, the Pro-Wrestling business decided to call itself professional. This is not the same as the difference between pro and amateur boxing, or pro and amateur golf. There is an amateur wrestling circuit, and this send athletes to the Olympics. But that is where the connections end. Any loser with a trampoline and a couple of ropes can make a ring, recruit five or six friends and call it a "professional wrestling" league. This does not make them pro-wrestlers.
The article for which you are willing to filibuster so much does not assert the subject's notability, it just sums up what is already listed on another site. If he was notable then he would have been covered in third party publications, not just on the fed's own website. You say that TNA won't list Kurt Angle's WWE career, true. But Chuck is no Kurt Angle. He is Joe Nobody, and who cares what other two-bit indy fed he worked in before he settled for the two-bit indy fed he works for now? In fact most Indy wrestlers run their own site so they can take bookings, and list what they have done, and most Indy sites don't mind listing what wrestlers have done as it makes them seem more important than they actually are.
This is not the place for a free website, nor the place to try to corral all his acheivements in one place. If you have this much time to waste defending his corner then I suggest you start a website for him, it's not 1994 anymore, there are hundreds of free sites that will host one. But this isn't the place.
Stop restating the same arguments over and over again. It just pumps the page up and does not help your argument, and the IP posts will most likely be discounted, so at the moment a close will be for delete, so here's an idea, why don't you edit the page and make it better?
Quit posting on the project page it just get weary, try doing some good, and for some reason stop thinking there is some vendetta about deletion, I nominated it because it was de-PROD-ed, if you had imporved the article in the five days you may have been able to keep it, or remove the PROD without an AfD, as it stands it will most likely be deleted. Darrenhusted 00:32, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] You want to try that again
Try using the + at the top and Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!
[edit] Chuck Taylor (wrestler)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Nenog 02:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] DRV
DRV looks at procedure of the AfD, not at the content of the deleted article or the subject of said article. Your spurious and irrelevant comments are getting increasingly disruptive. Please desist from continuing said antics. —Kurykh 00:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
