User talk:Thegone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Regarding edits to Dudjom Rinpoche

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Thegone! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bfreewebs\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 15:42, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Removing references is vandalism

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dudjom Rinpoche, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GlassFET 14:59, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Second warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Dudjom Rinpoche. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GlassFET 21:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Third warning

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dudjom Rinpoche, you will be blocked from editing. GlassFET 21:48, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fourth warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dudjom Rinpoche, you will be blocked from editing. GlassFET 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Further warning

Your removal of references and links from Dudjom Rinpoche is vandalism. Wikipedia is not censored. Your opinions about the organization publishing the material does not matter to Wikipedia. The information is verifiable, and that's the standard that is observed here. Please stop your sectarian-motivated vandalism. The conflict between different sects of your religion does not matter to us. P.S. I am not a member of the sect your are criticizing. GlassFET 15:16, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Removing warnings

It is not considered appropriate to try to hide the fact that you have been properly warned about your vandalism. Our processes require that admins review the warnings. GlassFET 15:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GlassFET maintaining false information

Mr/Ms. GlassFET First of all [defamation redacted]

Secondly the article contains untrue information as the photo of "Tenzin Yeshe Dorje Rinpoche" is in fact the other tulku, Dudjom rinpoche's (II) own grandson not "Tenzin Yeshe Dorje Rinpoche". "Tenzin Yeshe Dorje Rinpoche" is the other boy in the top photo named as Kyabje Dudjom Yangsi. Kyabje is just an honorary title and yangsi just means tulku (reborn) hence its not even a name. The wrong photo was mistitled by namkha.org and picked up by a few plagiarist sites later. There are many photos and documentation to prove this in the official site: dudjomba.org

If you are a person of honor and really mean that you care about not spreading false information then you'll visit "Tenzin Yeshe Dorje Rinpoche" (http://www.dudjomfoundation.org/ )official site and see that the tulku is not as titled in the cult's site. I will be saving a copy of this message and will continue to take this matter up if the false information by the cult is maintained.

You are of course welcome to add information to the article as long as it is verifiable and cited. Forums are however, not permitted to be used as sources. Also, you may not add your own personal opinions to the article, but only citable information from other sources. Please follow these policies of Wikipedia and stop edit warring and you will have less of a problem here. You will also want to about our rules about living people. Parts of your post above should probably be removed as the verge on defamation. GlassFET 17:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Dickshawn.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dickshawn.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 04:01, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dudjom Rinpoche and Dzogchen, you will be blocked from editing. GlassFET 20:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Block for legal threats and personal attacks

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for making legal threats. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 23:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

There is some discussion ongoing on WP:AN#Recommendation for Background check on Editors Being Promoted to Admin if this block was appropriate. The majority so far seems to agree that it wasn't and therefore I unblocked you. However, please note that it was not a good idea to bring up such content disputes on WP:AN in the first place. Please follow the steps on WP:DR instead. — Sebastian 02:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dated cleanup tags

Hi, thanks for your message, SmackBot does not generally add tags, but merely dates those that are already there. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 03:00 10 February 2008 (GMT).

Look at the page history,you will see that it is the previous editor. Rich Farmbrough, 11:23 12 February 2008 (GMT).