User talk:Thedarxide

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have nothing to hide. Anybody can see history of my discussion page. However, I like it blank. I will delete your message too in a few days. The warning I got was because of an experiment gone wrong, although I undid my mistakes, some autobot gave the warning anyways. I normally don't care about automatically generated massages. Believe me, I hate you! (talk) 16:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Why is her being in a Domino's pizza ad noteworthy? It cheapens her other notbale accomplishments, like it's the best thing she has ever done. I am a friend of Riki's and am not doing this to vandalize the page... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.24.205.1 (talk) 02:44, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


"Cheapens her other notable accomplishmenst" ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Sorry - that was a joke right? Clifbar123 (talk) 00:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from editing Old Collegians back to Notable Alumni on the Methodist College page. Ex Methody students are known as collegians and recognition of the old boys name is given on many other school sites where such a name exists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.41.250.2 (talk) 14:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey I am the person who made the edit regarding Fatal1ty in the Nickelback Rockstar video. Are you sure its not him? It looks a lot like him. --Christo387 (talk) 17:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] A.A. Gill

The edits were made by a sockpuppet of a banned editor, who has no right to edit Wikipedia therefore their edits are reverted. One Night In Hackney303 15:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ashida Kim

I noticed that you had removed a link added to the article, an thought you should know that as part of a reference I have added have used the same link and I would appreciate you input on if it is valid to use it in that context.--Nate1481(t/c) 14:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

I'll be removing the NPOV and BLP warning tags next week unless someone objects as the discussion has died out and the article seems to have settled in at an generally acceptable version. --Nate1481(t/c) 11:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)