User talk:Thebisch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

Hi, and welcome to my talk page! Please remember to:

  • Be civil!
  • Sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~)
  • Start new topics at the bottom, and give your message a ==descriptive heading==
  • When mentioning a specific page or user, giving me a [[wikilink]] is helpful
  • I tend to respond to your talk page, so expect my response there. If I post to your talk page first, I'll either follow the preferences you have there. Otherwise, I expect your response here on this page.

If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia or frequently asked questions. If you need editing help, head here.

Click here to leave me a new message.

Design and concept blatantly stolen from User:Kimon, User:Luna Santin and User:NikoSilver.



Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Thebisch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Natalie 21:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AWB

Can you disclose to me (onwiki or by email) the other account you used to edit under? Right now I would need to deny you with only 22 mainspace edits. Alternatively you could email another admin or crat who you know from your previous identity. MBisanz talk 19:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wild Hogs

are you sure about how it was bad —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.99.41.151 (talk) 01:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Revert

Hi, not every large removal of text is vandalism. See your edit here. Garion96 (talk) 16:01, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

True, but not always. Exceptions are there, but edits made with rolback are usually not vandalism. Garion96 (talk) 16:15, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Sort of. It can stay the way it is since the previous edit was ok'ish albeit with a lousy edit summary. There were a bunch of wp:blp issues he kept on reverting, only with his last edit he kept the sourced ones and removed the bad examples. This all was nothing bad, I don't mind my edit reverted, but just be careful not to bite newbies by tagging their edits as vandalism. Garion96 (talk) 16:24, 11 April 2008 (UTC)