User talk:The Right Honourable
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
[edit] Infobox Currency
Hi,
I see that you're trying to add superunit to the infobox. I fixed what you started. What do you have in mind for superunit besides grand for 1000 USD? --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 09:15, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Soviet ruble
Hi,
I see that you're trying to split Soviet ruble off from Russian ruble. IMHO, Soviet ruble is the right title name, and Soviet Ruble and Soviet Rouble should redirect to Soviet ruble. I can't move because Soviet ruble and directly copy-and-paste the content is highly discouraged. So I have made the request here and started a discussion. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 10:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Banknote infobox
Hi,
I understand you have the desire of putting banknote infobox out. And as a result, you created {{Infobox Banknote}}. However, there was another template {{Infobox Note}} that is currently under development. If I have time, I will be working on the infobox, and ultimately, to remove one of the duplicates. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 01:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- By the way, you can find a list of useful templates here. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 01:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:76-926obverse.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:76-926obverse.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Butseriouslyfolks 09:38, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Drugbox template names
Hi, interesting idea re list of names, but it needs prior discussion as tehre are various issues raised. Of most note is that drug articles should already be named for the INN, and BAN should follow the INNs. Individual discrepencies for USAN are perhaps best addressed in the article's introduction.
See Template talk:Drugbox for discussion. David Ruben Talk 02:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] drugbox vs. chembox
Indeed, the old {{chembox}} is very hard to handle, has some strange problems, and is plainly a page-hog that may scare of people when editing that page. I have been working on {{chembox new}}, which is much more sophisticated and works very much like the drugbox (parts of the code are drugbox code). I am still working on parts of the code (want to do some tricks with bp/mp and with the molecular formulae, and there are still some fields that need to be combined). Its design is completely modular, one can choose which modules to use, and which to keep out. Some modules already handle more than shown in {{chembox new}}, I think I will write a bit of a manual per module.
IMHO, it would be nice if all chemical compounds would have the same box, people outside chemistry then directly recognise that box, and know what to look for (we have about 4000 chemicals around!). There are now a couple of boxes (on some page some really old ones), most of them broken up, and very hard to maintain. Also, for chemical compounds on the edge of certain fields it is sometimes difficult to decide which box to use. I'd like to hear you opinion on the new box! Hope to see you around. --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Adreneline/Epinephrine
I'm not sure if the idea behind the move you did to Adreneline/Epinephrine is going to go over well, but it seems reasonable to me. In any case, it has two problems:
- Adrenaline is traditionally spelled adrenaline, not adreneline. The chem diagram has this problem as well as the article title.
- The move left a number of double-redirects, which need to be fixed since they leave readers using them short of the article.
-R. S. Shaw 08:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 02:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Whatever!The Right Honourable 09:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:76-926reverse.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:76-926reverse.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:76-926reverse.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:76-926reverse.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:76-926obverse.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:76-926obverse.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:76-926obverse.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:76-926obverse.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed article for deletion
[edit] Lysergic acid (disambiguation)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Lysergic acid (disambiguation), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Lilac Soul 22:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Um, why is this here? Newyorkbrad 00:12, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Because when you add the prod template to a page, it suggests that you inform the person who originally created the page so that they can protest and offer their opinions on the matter.Lilac Soul 15:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your recent edits
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 08:52, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Drug templates
Why are you removing templates from the drug articles? I shall put them back later, unless you can convince me that there is a good reason for their removal. Also, please supply an edit summary for all edits you make. Regards, Colin°Talk 08:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Attack
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on this page, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because the article is a page created primarily to disparage its subject or a biography of a living person that is controversial in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral point of view version in the history to revert to. (CSD G10).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting the article, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate the article itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. CSDWarnBot 14:39, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Retard woman
Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Image:Retard woman.jpg. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Colin°Talk 12:17, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
