User talk:The Norse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have recently created the article 403 Forbiddena. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Deleted content

Per your request, I pulled the last version of the deleted article and placed it in your userspace: User:The Norse/403 Forbiddena. The article should not be recreated in the main userspace unless you can provide sources that show it meets WP:MUSIC notability criteria. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: I've moved List of Samurai Shodown characters to a user sub-page.

That's all well and good, but I have one major objection: present tense is how we discuss legend and literature in the English language, even if they never did happen, and even if it is a retelling of the distant past (see [1], for example). Unless there is a WP guideline for fiction that I am seriously missing, the present tense is correct. -MissingNOOO 00:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Nonsense. If this is being done absolutely to-the-letter correct, it should be very clear when things are taking place (and I don't think it's going to be that hard, considering how little backstory most characters have). It would be something like:
  • In SS5, character is looking for blah.
  • In SS, character is motivated by meh.
  • Prior to SS2, character is on trip to ___ and does not make appearance.
  • In SS2, character etc. etc.
Granted, I'm nowhere near done revising the entire damn article, but what can I do? I'm busy in real life. Kind of on the "if I don't haul butt right now, I will not stay in school" level. -MissingNOOO 13:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wild Arms 2

Hey, Norse. I have no problem at all with you using my WA2 write-up, and I'm glad it's going to get some use after all. Sorry I wasn't able to finish it, I got sidetracked with other projects. Maybe I'll get around to updating the article sometime now that it's at a serviceable state, but I appreciate the message and that you're trying to get the Wild Arms articles in better shape. Nall 02:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Oban Star Racers Trivia

I'll link the source, its from the Official Oban Forums, some members on there were in contact with the creator and those were some answers he provided. I'll link to it in the Oban page.--Sir-Koji (talk) 00:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Centralized TV Episode Discussion

Over the past months, TV episodes have been reverted by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [2]. --Maniwar (talk) 00:29, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Bivattchee

A tag has been placed on Bivattchee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] TTN

This comment was completely unacceptable. Comments like that can result in blocking. I suggest cessation. seresin || wasn't he just...? 23:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Nakon 23:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Check my history again, there isn't any vandalism there. Your over-defensiveness of TTN isn't grounds for a blocking."

Decline reason: "Looking over your edits, I see a lot of disruption, and some very dubious edits which led to you being "mistakenly" blocked for being a vandalism only account. Given the horrendous personal attack you made to TTN, I see no reason to unblock you. — Ryan Postlethwaite 00:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

lol lack of Appeal option, this'll never get responded to. I don't see any "dubious" or unconstructive edits to any articles. Could you point a few out so I can learn from my alleged mistakes? - The Norse (talk) 00:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

A quick look at your talk page history[3] shows numerous times you have been asked to remain civil and not make personal attacks. This final one on TTN was disgraceful and could easily have earned you an indef block in it's own right, given the previous history of attacks, and you inability to learn from them despite other users gently prodding you, I again believe that an indef block is the correct option. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:27, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Oh hey, a response. That's cool. I personally feel that having the fortitude to call out TTN on his obvious flaws should warrant a few dozen Barnstars, but I see where you're coming from. If you insist on keeping the block, I would like to formally request the reason for this account's blocking to be changed to reflect the real reason instead of being noted as a common vandal. Maybe a reason along the lines of "being a pain in the ass" like that one guy on Nakon's talk page stated.
On that subject, maybe he should be blocked too, after all he did use a cuss word and that's technically worse than anything I've ever said. - The Norse (talk) 00:53, 23 January 2008 (UTC)