User talk:The Iceman2288

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, The Iceman2288, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Stephenb (Talk) 19:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Doctor Who Series 3 episode titles

Where have the episode titles:

  • Daleks in Manhattan
  • The Lazarus Experiment
  • The Family of Blood
  • Utopioa

been confirmed? Stephenb (Talk) 19:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of Doctor Who serials

According to the press release at Outpost Gallifrey (click here), 'three new episode titles' will be revealed in DWM issue 380. As this isn't officially on sale until 1 March 2007, please refrain from adding links and/or articles for Blink (Doctor Who), The Sound of Drums (Doctor Who), Human Nature (Doctor Who episode) (the latter two currently redirect to List of Doctor Who serials) or any similar titles. Silver Nemesis 17:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sarah Jane adventures

The new doctor who mag isn't out yet, can i ask you how you know the titles for the SJA episodes and give me a source other then the magazine to back it up?Wiggstar69 12:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

These people could be lying, it says nothing about it on the reveiw for the magazine on www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho and on the news part of OG its the same. I'd wait until its out to be honest.Wiggstar69 13:41, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Revenge of the Slitheen

Where has this title for episodes 1/2 of The Sarah Jane Adventures been confirmed? --OZOO (What?) 10:12, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Right, thanks. --OZOO (What?) 10:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Slitheen2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Slitheen2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Slitheen2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Slitheen2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:17, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DWM

Sorry about that revert, I was only going by what I had read. Can you please cite the page number and article title in the usual way: {citation |date= [[date]] (cover date) |title= (article title) |periodical=[[Doctor Who Magazine]] |issue= 389 |pages= (page numbers)}} Thanks StuartDD contributions 12:37, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Riftml2.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Riftml2.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:45, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter, March 2008

The Space-Time Telegraph
The WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter
Issue 1 March 2008
Project News
We have five new participants: Sm9800, Seanor3, T saston, Type 40, Jammy0002.
One editor has left the project: StuartDD.
The Doctor Who portal has expanded to increase the number of selected stories to 33.
Articles of note
New featured articles
None
New featured article candidates
New good articles
Delisted articles
None
Proposals
A proposal for changing the layout of the episode pages is under way here.
A discussion about the formatting of the cast lists in episode pages is under way here.
A discussion to move United Nations Intelligence Taskforce to UNIT is under way here.
News
The Torchwood project has become a task-force under the project's scope.
The Torchwood series 2 finale airs on 4th April, and the 4th series of Doctor Who will start to air on 5th April.

For the Doctor Who project, Sceptre (talk) 19:34, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
You have received this letter because you are on the newsletter recipients list. To opt-out, please remove your name.

[edit] April 2008

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to List of unmade Doctor Who serials and films. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. And reverting the removal with no reason is not good, either —TreasuryTag—t—c 09:53, 20 April 2008 (UTC)