User talk:The First Darklord

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Davros, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - The difference here is that this is VERIFIED information, whereas the trailer does not contain VERIFIABLE data. I suggest you stop being disruptive to prove a WP:POINT, and you also might want to look here. --Rodhullandemu 23:19, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

After discussing it with treasuryTag, all information regarding Davros' return (such as the description of the new villain not directly stated to be Davros) is invalid and shouldn't be allowed. If it is then information regarding the trailer should be taken into account because it hints at his return but does not state it, like the description on the article. I have noticed that I accidently deleted the part about Character Options releasing a toy about it, because it is about Davros, that was a mistake(sorry), but the rest must either be taken account of or they shouldn't, including the description by CBBC website and the official trailer. Exceptions for one and not the other are unacceptable. The First Darklord (talk) 23:43, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Fair enough. Better to wait until we have better information. --Rodhullandemu 23:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)