User talk:The Fifth Horseman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents


Welcome!

Hello, The Fifth Horseman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  PJM 20:05, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Question

You seem to know alot about Bloodrayne other than me. So answer me this question:

[1]

would this be the beta version of Rayne? I was planning on add info from this. THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED! 02:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

another question: you added "....although that has been denied multiple times by the TRI representatives when discussed on bloodrayne.co.uk forums" (Durham red). Did you ever see this disscussion? If you have, could you give me the link? I could use that has a citation. THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED! 22:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Quick note: Warnings

Hi there. Thanks a bajillion for helping out on reverting vandalism. You're doing a great job, especially for just having recently joined =). I only have one picky complaint, though. When you're adding warnings to user pages, please make sure to add the article name for which you're warning as well. That way, anyone else who comes along after you to see how badly a particular user has been vandalizing versus how much they've been warned (so that an admin can then block them if they're persistent), we'll know what the warning is talking about. Anyway, hope that makes sense, and sorry for griping. :P Thanks again, and keep up the great work. Cheers =) --koder 12:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] counter vandalism

Hi,

I noticed you worked to revert vandalism earlier today, and commented on 72.1.206.143. While we all get the urge, keep in mind WP:DIV. Keep fighting the good fight.  :) PStrait 16:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Thanks

Thanks for reverting my user page from the vandalism of Renlok. I have reported him to AIV and will be monitoring his every edit until he gets blocked. Keep up the good work. Useight 08:04, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your message

Thanks for the heads up, You should also mention that to the Firefox people in case there's an issue with long edit fields. I used TWINKLE to tag, so that might need looking at as well. :) Sfan00 IMG 13:13, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Checkuser case completed

Hi, A checkuser IP Check case you filled has been completed by a CheckUser, and archived. You can find the results for 7 days at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive. -- lucasbfr talk, checkuser clerk, 00:55, 31 July 2007 (UTC).

[edit] helpme

I want to do a page for Thrillville: Off The Rails like this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrillville but I dont know how to do it can you help me

Canand1 14:44, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

removed bogus helpme by User:Canand1 :) -- lucasbfr talk 15:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thank you for beating down a vandal for me. Cheers. Prester John -(Talk to the Hand) 15:12, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome not, i noticed you deleted some of the work i added to articles, i will now ask you not to do that, as i am busy and i will return later to cite references. Also i do think that it was right for you to delete the infomation i added to last cannibal world, as it was all true, thank you!!!!!

[edit] Question

Hi, I'm new to Wikipedia, so apologies if I'm posting this in the incorrect place. I just received a notice when creating the basics of a page for the Irish rock band catoan saying that the page is marked for speedy deletion due to the act not being of notability. The only reason why I began to form the page was because the act had been marked by Wikipedia for requested information: please see [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_articles/music/Performers_and_bands]Efterlots 10:35, 17 August 2007 (UTC)efterlotsEfterlots 10:35, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


Hi, yes, I understand that. catoan meet the first of these. It's just a matter of entering the verified info.

"A musician or ensemble (note that this includes a band, singer, rapper, orchestra, DJ, musical theatre group, etc.) is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria:

  1. It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable."


Sure. It may take me a while to work out how to do that, but it will all be verifiable.

hi there again, I've added in links to articles and interviews for now but will try to bulk out the written info with references overt he next while. Is this enough to prevent it being deleted for now? thanks.

[edit] Why you gotta hate???

Enquires Day Wrecker Core Ha 08:37, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Error 372: Definition Hate not present in database. --The Fifth Horseman 08:46, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Query: Subject enquiry caused by: Action: Warn placement on: subject talk page? --The Fifth Horseman 08:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Acorah's Angel on WP:AIV

This account was created in January 2007, and predates Acorah by months. You'll need to provide more evidence to convince me of sock puppetry. --  Netsnipe  ►  09:46, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re:Impostor

Thanks for your comment. If he does it again, I'll do as you suggest and just report him. I was waiting on him to do something clearly incivil or vandalistic before reporting him. Thanks for reporting him to WP:UAA. Parsecboy 16:31, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: yor report at UAA

I removed Secretmrx (talk · contribs) because the website you linked is nothing more than this user's lame website. I don't think it qualifies as an ad ;). -- lucasbfr talk 10:05, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. I didn't notice it until now. Carlossuarez46 19:12, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Abandonia

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Abandonia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Whispering 13:28, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Abandonia AfD

I gotta be honest, when I posted an AfD for this, I half expected a horde of forum-trolls to flood things going "HOW DAR U SAI TIS SITE DELETE!!! IS NOTIBLE!". Well, maybe not that bad, but at least a bunch of people who think their site is the most significant thing in the world, and THAT should be enough to get an article.
Instead, you and others from the site came with with a well-reasoned argument against deletion. You addressed the issues with sourcing, and worked out a solution that makes everyone happy. It was even very civil over on your own forums (yes, I checked), where I half expected to see death threats against me for daring to do this.
I appreciate the way this was handled. Your site and it's visitors have gathered my respect, and if you need anything, help with the article, whatever, don't hesitate to ask. --UsaSatsui 20:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

for the vandalism revert! :) Larklight (talk) 20:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reported

I have reported you to wikipedia for continual vandalism and harassment as per what you've done on my userpage of my username BetterThanMe and under the user page of my IP address. 67.53.130.69 (talk) 11:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Canuck/Canucks

The official name of the team is plural: Canucks. A team member can be correctly described as "a Canuck", but to refer to them as "a Canuck player" is grammatically incorrect. Just like "Islander player" "Flame player" or "Leaf player" are also incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.227.185 (talk) 10:27, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Do not delete talk page content

I noticed at Talk:DOSBox you have been deleting discussions. Though this possibly may have been in good faith, it is improper; old discussions should be archived, not deleted. Ham Pastrami (talk) 21:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hey bud, I love you more than you know

How is it going, douche? I'm going to kill you and eat your skin. Prepare yourself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ArenaRock (talk • contribs) 18:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)