User talk:TheRingess/Archive 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
skinhat Sorry being immature with the reverts. I wont do it anymore. Annoyed you deleted the Meanies. There are many links to meanies so it should have a page.
Contents |
Well, here you go...
Furthermore, you should consider joining the Welcoming Committee :-). JHMM13 (T | C) 
07:30, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
Seduction Community
I've speedy deleted this as a repost of material previously deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seduction Community, but I note that you tell User:Seductionreport you'd nominated it for deletion? There's nothing on the "what links here" tab...
brenneman{T}{L} 11:13, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, I didn't want to leave a discussion hanging somewhere when I deleted the article. And that bloody practical joke not only got me last night, but almost again just now! - brenneman{T}{L} 01:31, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Divine Word
Hi, just noticed the copyvio myself when you tagged it. -- JJay 06:12, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Buyer's Market
I posted a message on the talk page for the novel A Buyer's Market in reaction to your edits. Hellycopper 23:23, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
About the Moser Glass stub
Thanks for your help! I was scratching my head thinking about how to place the Moser Glass article as a business stub... (btw I hope more people would be able to work on the stub) - thanks again! Kyle 04:39, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Request for update?
Hi you put in a request for an update on the David Barnett entry. I am unclear what you wanted updated - I've added a note into the Discussion page and if you could clarify what it is you were looking for I'll see what I can do about sorting out finding the info you want. Thanks (Emperor 15:57, 19 February 2006 (UTC))
Random Acts of Kindness Award
I have noted all your great work in building community and connectivity. Kukini 05:41, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi
Hi Ringess, I see you are in a mad rush to add npov to the article that I was editing, (Math of Quran) You have also quoted it unreferenced., I just started the article, before I could save my edit you had added these things..Anyway thanks for your interest in the article. But I advice you to wait for a while and see before you add npov or unreferenced, because in case of new articles people might be just adding info as you rush into conclusions. (Mystic 05:47, 20 February 2006 (UTC))
You might want to go check this...
Mandy Misko. I gave this user the 3rr warning, but it was reverted anyway. Kukini 06:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Prod tags
Please remember that {{prod}} tags are for uncontested deletions. If anyone, including the author, objects to the PROD you should look for another solution like AFD. Kappa 01:17, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- I was just about to say the same thing. If anyone removes {{prod}} for any reason at all, it shouldn't be reinstated. It's not like AfD. I agree that Dolceoro is a bad article, but the right thing to do is to take it to AfD. rodii 03:35, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Tony Earley
"I came across this article randomly. I noticed that it says that he is currently working on his 2nd novel. I noticed that you created it. Is he still working on it? Perhaps you could update it if he isn't."
I had read in a magazine article that he was. I do not know whether or not it is still true so I deleted the sentence. Mp623
David Quinn (Actor)
If you revert an article, as you have done with David Quinn (Actor) you must describe that you have reverted in the edit summary. Using something like "some more minor cleanup" is misleading, bad faith and blockable. If you revert and don't use the word "revert" in the edit summary you will be blocked. First and final warning.--Commander Keane 00:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- I haven't warned anyone else yet, but may do in the future. Also, where did my comment go? It appears to have been blanked. At least archive, else it will look like you are trying to hide something. --Commander Keane 01:07, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
