Theories of humor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 This article or section is in the middle of an expansion or major revamping.
You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well.
Please view the edit history should you wish to contact the person who placed this template. If this article has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. Consider not tagging with a deletion tag unless the page hasn't been edited in several days.

Theories of humor are attempts to explain what causes people to perceive humor in things, events or texts. A closely related topic is the theories of laughter.

Contents

[edit] Superiority theory

The superiority theory of humor traces back to works of Plato and Aristotle. This theory explains that a person laughs about misfortunes of others, because these misfortunes assert the person's superiority on the background of shortcomings of others. [1]

For Aristotle, we laugh at inferior or ugly individuals, because we feel a joy at being superior to them. Socrates was reported by Plato as saying that the ridiculous was characterized by a display of self-ignorance.

[edit] Incongruity

Te incongruity theory states that humor is perceived at the moment of realization of incongruity between a concept involved in a certain situation and the real objects thought to be in some relation to the concept.[1]

Since the main point of the theory is not the incongruity per se, but its realization and resolution (i.e, putting the objects in question into the real relation), it is often called the incongruity-resolution theory.[1]

Francis Hutcheson expressed in Thoughts on Laughter (1725) what became a key concept in the evolving theory of the comic: laughter as a response to the perception of incongruity.[2] Arthur Schopenhauer wrote that the perceived incongruity is between a concept and the real object it represents. Hegel shared almost exactly the same view, but saw the concept as an "appearance" and believed that laughter then totally negates that appearance. For Sigmund Freud, laughter is an "economical phenomenon" whose function is to release "psychic energy" that had been wrongly mobilized by incorrect or false expectations.

The first full formulation of the incongruity theory is attributed to Emmanuel Kant. [1]

[edit] General Theory of Verbal Humor

The General Theory of Verbal Humor (GTVH) proposed by Victor Raskin and Salvatore Attardo (and known for some time under the name of semantic script theory of humour, SSTH) identifies a semantic model capable of expressing incongruities between semantic scripts in verbal humor; this has been seen as an important recent development in the theory of laughter. [3]

[edit] References

  1. ^ a b c d M.P. Mulder, A. Nijholt (2002) "Humour Research: State of the Art"
  2. ^ Peter Ludwig Berger Redeeming Laughter: The Comic Dimension of Human Experience (1997) p.22
  3. ^ Salvatore Attardo
    • (1994) Linguistic Theories of Humor, Walter de Gruyter, ISBN 3110142554
    • (2001) Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis, Walter de Gruyter, ISBN 311017068X
      • In this book Attardo finalizes the general theory of verbal humour suggested by him and Victor Raskin in 1991: Salvatore Attardo and Victor Raskin. Script theory revis(it)ed: joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor, 4(3):293-347, 1991