The Primary Classical Language of the World

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Primary Classical Language of the World is a 1966 book by Devaneya Pavanar.

"Lemuria" according to Pavanar, connecting Madagascar, South India and Australia (covering most of the Indian Ocean). Mount Meru stretches southwards from Sri Lanka.
"Lemuria" according to Pavanar, connecting Madagascar, South India and Australia (covering most of the Indian Ocean). Mount Meru stretches southwards from Sri Lanka.

In this book, Pavanar in the English language details his claim that Tamil is a "superior and more divine" language than Sanskrit. In his view the Tamil language originated in "Lemuria" (இலெமூரியா Ilemūriyā), the cradle of civilization and place of origin of language. He believed that evidence of Tamil's antiquity was being suppressed by Sanskritists[citation needed].

Contents

[edit] Pavanar's timeline

Pavanar's timeline for the evolution of mankind and Tamil is as follows:

  • ca. 500,000 BC: origin of the human race,
  • ca. 200,000 to 50,000 BC: evolution of "the Tamilian or Homo Dravida[1]",
  • ca. 200,000 to 100,000 BC, beginnings of Tamil
  • ca. 100,000 to 50,000 BC, growth and development of Tamil,
  • 50,000 BC: Kumari Kandam civilisation
  • 20,000 BC: A lost Tamil culture of the Easter Island which had an advanced civilisation
  • 16,000 BC: Lemuria submerged
  • 6087 BC: Second Tamil Sangam established by a Pandya king
  • 3031 BC: A Chera prince in his wanderings in the Solomon Island saw wild sugarcane and started cultivation in Tamilnadu.
  • 1780 BC: The Third Tamil Sangam established by a Pandya king
  • 7th century BC: Tolkappiyam, the earliest extant Tamil grammar

[edit] Easter Island

Carbon dating, and pollen analysis of lake sediments has led archaeologists to the view that Easter Island was probably settled around 700 CE and certainly not before 300 CE[citation needed]. A lost Tamil culture on the island 20,000 years ago would not fit this chronology[citation needed].

[edit] Lemuria

Due to advances in the science of Plate Tectonics the idea of geologically recent Lost continents such as Lemuria has been rejected by the scientific community[citation needed]. However lower sea levels in the last ice age would have left dry land for miles from the coast of current South India and much of the Palk Strait would have been dry land in 16,000 BC[citation needed].

[edit] Quote from Pavanar

In the preface, Pavanar writes:

There is no other language in the whole world as Tamil, that has suffered so much damage by natural and human agencies, and has been done so much injustice by malignant foreigners and native dupes.
The general belief that all arts and sciences are progressively advancing with the passage of time, is falsified in the case of philology, owing to the fundamental blunder of locating the original home of the Tamilians in the Mediterranean region, and taking Sanskrit, a post-Vedic semi-artificial composite literary dialect, the Indian Esperanto, so to speak, for the prototype of the Indo-European Form of Speech.
Westerners do not know as yet, that Tamil is a highly developed classical language of Lemurian origin, and has been, and is being still, suppressed by a systematic and co-ordinated effort by the Sanskritists both in the public and private sectors, ever since the Vedic mendicants migrated to the South, and taking utmost advantage of their superior complexion and the primitive credulity of the ancient Tamil kings, posed themselves as earthly gods (Bhu-suras) and deluded the Tamilians into the belief, that their ancestral language or literary dialect was divine or celestial in origin.
After the independent discovery of Sanskrit by Sir William Jones in 1796, the situation of Tamil became worse, as the Max Mullerian school exclusively devoted its attention to Sanskrit studies[citation needed], and blindly believing the Sanskrit records[citation needed], promoted and propagated them far and wide[citation needed], and thereby gave a fresh impetus to the Sanskritists'[citation needed]continuation of their ancestral crimes of imposture[citation needed], plagiarism[citation needed]and indirect vandalism[citation needed]. Even Dr. Caldwell's researches in Dravidian philology[citation needed], though conducted in the heart of the Tamil country for about half a century, could not improve the situation to any appreciable degree, owing to his inaccessibility to the extant ancient Tamil literature and unfavourable obsessions.
Erroneous theories and principles adopted in any branch of science or department of literature have to be discarded forth-with and outright, in the interest of human enlightenment, however deep-seated and long-entertained they may be in the minds of authors and scholars.[citation needed]
The Aryan suppression of Tamil does not stop with itself[citation needed], but affects the growth of three other branches of study of widest human interest, viz., World History, Comparative Philology and Cultural Anthropology[citation needed]. Sanskrit has usurped the throne of Tamil by fraudulent means, and unless Tamil is restored to its prestine glory, there is no future for it[citation needed].
It is high time that the Western Universities particularly the West German University, realised their colossal error, at least at this stage, and give Tamil its due place in Comparative Philology. It also behoves the Western Publishers, to bring out revised and expurgatory editions of their publications dealing with South Indian History and Dravidian Philology, as early as possible, in the light of recent research.
The present work, embodying the results of my research in Comparative Philology in general and Dravidian Philology at particular, conducted for the past forty years, purports to prove that Old or Lemurian Tamil was not only the parent of the Dravidian family of languages, but also the progeniter of the Indo-European Form of Speech.

[edit] Tamil more divine than Sanskrit

In a chapter entitled Tamil more divine than Sanskrit, Pavanar gives the following reasons why he judges Tamil to be "more divine" than Sanskrit:

Tamil Language Sanskrit Language
Primitive and original. Derivative.
Spoken and living language. Semi-artificial literary dialect.
Of Lemurian Origin. Of Indian Origin.
Scriptural studies exoteric. Scriptural studies esoteric.
Inculcation of cosmopolitanism. Division of society into numerous castes on the basis of birth and parentage.
Admission of all to asceticism. Restriction of asceticism to Brahmins.
Holding higher education common to all. Restriction of higher education to Sanskritists.
Encouragement of gifts to all the poor and needy. Enjoinment on the donors to give only to the Sans-kritists.
Love of truth. Love of imposture and plagiarism.
Laying of emphasis on love, as means of attaining eternal bliss. Laying of emphasis on knowledge, as means of attaining union with the universal soul.
Having monotheistic Sai-vism and Vaisnavism as religions. Having a system of sacrifices to minor deities as religion.
Literary description natural. Literary description imaginary.

[edit] Primary Classicality of Tamil

Claims regarding the "Primary Classicality of Tamil":

  1. Lemurian origin of Tamil.
  2. Phonological simplicity of Tamil.
  3. Catholicity of Tamil.
  4. Tamulic substratum of the Aryan family of languages.
  5. Morphological purity and primitiveness of Tamil.
  6. The presence of the words ‘amma’ and ‘appa’ in almost all great languages in some form or other.
  7. Absence of Nominative case-termination in Tamil.
  8. Separability and significance of all affixes in Tamil.
  9. Absence of morphological gender in Tamil
  10. Absence of arbitrary words in Tamil.
  11. Traceability of Tamil to its very origin.
  12. Logical and natural order of words in Tamil.
  13. Absence of dual number in Tamil.
  14. Originality and natural development of Tamil.
  15. Highest order of the classicality of Tamil.

[edit] Editions

  • The Primary Classical Language of the World, Katpadi Estension, North Arcot Dt., Mukkudal (Nesamani Publishing House), Paari Nilayam, Madras (1966)
  • reprint Chennai : G. Elavazhagan, 2001.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ a term of Edgar Thurston's: see Ajay Skaria, Shades of Wildness Tribe, Caste, and Gender in Western India, The Journal of Asian Studies (1997), p. 730.