The Football League 1994-95
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Statistics of The Football League in season 1994/1995.
Contents |
[edit] Overview
[edit] Division One
The streamlining of the Premier League meant that just two clubs would be promoted from Division One in 1995. Middlesbrough won the Division One title in their first season under Bryan Robson, while Reading were the club that were to fail to win promotion despite finishing second in the table. Instead, they competed in the playoffs, losing to Bolton Wanderers in the final, who achieved their second promotion in three years under Bruce Rioch - as well as being League Cup runners-up.
1995 saw four clubs relegated from Division One - Swindon Town (relegated for the second straight season), Burnley, Bristol City and Notts County. Sunderland narrowly avoided the drop following the arrival of enthusiastic new manager Peter Reid, who over the next few years would bring dramatic improvements to the Wearsiders.
[edit] Division Two
There would only be two promotion places in Division Two for 1994-95. They were occupied by champions Birmingham City and playoff winners Huddersfield Town, both enjoying success after seasons of disappointment.
Going down were Cambridge United, Plymouth Argyle, Cardiff City, Chester City and Leyton Orient. This was the first time that five clubs had been relegated from any of the league's four divisions.
[edit] Division Three
This season saw three clubs go up from Division Three instead of four clubs. They were champions Carlisle United, runners-up Walsall and playoff winners Chesterfield.
Exeter City, who almost went out of business in mid-season, finished bottom of Division Three but kept their league status because Conference champions Macclesfield Town were unable to meet the league's stadium capacity requirements.
[edit] League Standings
[edit] Endsleigh League Division One
A dream start in management saw Bryan Robson guide Middlesbrough to the Division One title and regain the Premiership place that was lost two years ago. Reading finished second - the highest in their history - but the streamlining of the Premiership prevented them from winning promotion and they lost 4-3 to Bolton Wanderers after extra time in the playoff final, having led 2-0 at half time. Losing semi-finalists were Wolverhampton Wanderers and Tranmere Rovers.
Barnsley and Watford were the unlucky sides to narrowly miss out on the playoffs, while an expensively-assembled Derby County side finished a disappointing ninth at the end of what many fans had hoped would be a promotion winning season.
Portsmouth, West Bromwich Albion and Sunderland - three famous clubs which had seen better days - narrowly avoided relegation to Division Two, but managerial changes at each of these clubs gave fans hope that a return to the elite might not be far away.
Swindon Town suffered a second successive relegation, joining Bristol City, Burnley and Notts County in Division Two.
Pos. | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Middlesbrough | 46 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 67 | 40 | 82 |
2. | Reading | 46 | 23 | 10 | 13 | 58 | 44 | 79 |
3. | Bolton | 46 | 21 | 14 | 11 | 67 | 45 | 77 |
4. | Wolves | 46 | 21 | 13 | 12 | 77 | 61 | 76 |
5. | Tranmere | 46 | 22 | 10 | 14 | 67 | 58 | 76 |
6. | Barnsley | 46 | 20 | 12 | 14 | 63 | 52 | 72 |
7. | Watford | 46 | 19 | 13 | 14 | 52 | 46 | 70 |
8. | Sheffield Utd | 46 | 17 | 17 | 12 | 74 | 55 | 68 |
9. | Derby | 46 | 18 | 12 | 16 | 66 | 51 | 66 |
10. | Grimsby | 46 | 17 | 14 | 15 | 62 | 56 | 65 |
11. | Stoke | 46 | 16 | 15 | 15 | 50 | 53 | 63 |
12. | Millwall | 46 | 16 | 14 | 16 | 60 | 60 | 62 |
13. | Southend | 46 | 18 | 8 | 20 | 54 | 73 | 62 |
14. | Oldham Ath | 46 | 16 | 13 | 17 | 60 | 60 | 61 |
15. | Charlton | 46 | 16 | 11 | 19 | 58 | 66 | 59 |
16. | Luton | 46 | 15 | 13 | 18 | 61 | 64 | 58 |
17. | Port Vale | 46 | 15 | 13 | 18 | 58 | 64 | 58 |
18. | Portsmouth | 46 | 15 | 13 | 18 | 53 | 63 | 58 |
19. | West Brom | 46 | 16 | 10 | 20 | 51 | 57 | 58 |
20. | Sunderland | 46 | 12 | 18 | 16 | 41 | 45 | 54 |
21. | Swindon | 46 | 12 | 12 | 22 | 54 | 73 | 48 |
22. | Burnley | 46 | 11 | 13 | 22 | 49 | 74 | 46 |
23. | Bristol City | 46 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 42 | 63 | 45 |
24. | Notts County | 46 | 9 | 13 | 24 | 45 | 66 | 40 |
[edit] Endsleigh League Division Two
Birmingham City sealed an immediate return to Division One by lifting the Division Two championship trophy, joined by playoff winners Huddersfield Town. The unlucky sides in the playoffs were Brentford, Crewe Alexandra and Bristol Rovers.
Unfavoured Leyton Orient, Chester City and Cardiff City were (perhaps inevitably) relegated to Division Three. But the other two relegated teams were surprise candidates for the drop. Plymouth Argyle had almost won promotion to Division One a year earlier. Cambridge United had narrowly missed out on a place in the then-new Premier League three years earlier and poor form in the run in sealed their fate after Bournemouth avoided the drop in the final two games of the season after spending most of it in the bottom five.
Pos. | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Birmingham | 46 | 25 | 14 | 7 | 84 | 37 | 89 |
2. | Brentford | 46 | 25 | 10 | 11 | 81 | 39 | 85 |
3. | Crewe | 46 | 25 | 8 | 13 | 80 | 68 | 83 |
4. | Bristol Rovers | 46 | 22 | 16 | 8 | 70 | 40 | 82 |
5. | Huddersfield | 46 | 22 | 15 | 9 | 79 | 49 | 81 |
6. | Wycombe | 46 | 21 | 15 | 10 | 60 | 46 | 78 |
7. | Oxford | 46 | 21 | 12 | 13 | 66 | 52 | 75 |
8. | Hull | 46 | 21 | 11 | 14 | 70 | 57 | 74 |
9. | York City | 46 | 21 | 9 | 16 | 67 | 51 | 72 |
10. | Swansea | 46 | 19 | 14 | 13 | 57 | 45 | 71 |
11. | Stockport | 46 | 19 | 8 | 19 | 63 | 60 | 65 |
12. | Blackpool | 46 | 18 | 10 | 18 | 64 | 70 | 64 |
13. | Wrexham | 46 | 16 | 15 | 15 | 65 | 64 | 63 |
14. | Bradford City | 46 | 16 | 12 | 18 | 57 | 64 | 60 |
15. | Peterborough | 46 | 14 | 18 | 14 | 54 | 69 | 60 |
16. | Brighton | 46 | 14 | 17 | 15 | 54 | 53 | 59 |
17. | Rotherham | 46 | 14 | 14 | 18 | 57 | 61 | 56 |
18. | Shrewsbury | 46 | 13 | 14 | 19 | 54 | 62 | 53 |
19. | Bournemouth | 46 | 13 | 11 | 22 | 49 | 69 | 50 |
20. | Cambridge | 46 | 11 | 15 | 20 | 52 | 69 | 48 |
21. | Plymouth | 46 | 12 | 10 | 24 | 45 | 83 | 46 |
22. | Cardiff | 46 | 9 | 11 | 26 | 46 | 74 | 38 |
23. | Chester | 46 | 6 | 11 | 29 | 37 | 84 | 29 |
24. | Leyton Orient | 46 | 6 | 8 | 32 | 30 | 75 | 26 |
[edit] Endsleigh League Division Three
Ambitious Carlisle United sealed the Division Three title to end eight years of basement division football, joined by runners-up Walsall and playoff winners Chesterfield.
Debt-ridden Exeter City finished joint bottom of the league with Scarborough, but retained their league status due to Conference champions Macclesfield Town lacking a stadium adeqaute for Football League capacity standards.
Pos. | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Carlisle | 42 | 27 | 10 | 5 | 67 | 31 | 91 |
2. | Walsall | 42 | 24 | 11 | 7 | 75 | 40 | 83 |
3. | Chesterfield | 42 | 23 | 12 | 7 | 62 | 37 | 81 |
4. | Bury | 42 | 23 | 11 | 8 | 73 | 36 | 80 |
5. | Preston | 42 | 19 | 10 | 13 | 58 | 41 | 67 |
6. | Mansfield | 42 | 18 | 11 | 13 | 84 | 59 | 65 |
7. | Scunthorpe | 42 | 18 | 8 | 16 | 68 | 63 | 62 |
8. | Fulham | 42 | 16 | 14 | 12 | 60 | 54 | 62 |
9. | Doncaster | 42 | 17 | 10 | 15 | 58 | 43 | 61 |
10. | Colchester | 42 | 16 | 10 | 16 | 56 | 64 | 58 |
11. | Barnet | 42 | 15 | 11 | 16 | 56 | 63 | 56 |
12. | Lincoln | 42 | 15 | 11 | 16 | 54 | 55 | 56 |
13. | Torquay | 42 | 14 | 13 | 15 | 54 | 57 | 55 |
14. | Wigan | 42 | 14 | 10 | 18 | 53 | 60 | 52 |
15. | Rochdale | 42 | 12 | 14 | 16 | 44 | 67 | 50 |
16. | Hereford | 42 | 12 | 13 | 17 | 45 | 62 | 49 |
17. | Northampton | 42 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 45 | 67 | 44 |
18. | Hartlepool | 42 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 43 | 69 | 43 |
19. | Gillingham | 42 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 46 | 64 | 41 |
20. | Darlington | 42 | 11 | 8 | 23 | 43 | 57 | 41 |
21. | Scarborough | 42 | 8 | 10 | 24 | 49 | 70 | 34 |
22. | Exeter | 42 | 8 | 10 | 24 | 36 | 70 | 34 |
[edit] See also
[edit] References
This article does not cite any references or sources. (March 2008) Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. |