Talk:The Year of the Sex Olympics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Year of the Sex Olympics article.

Article policies
Good article The Year of the Sex Olympics has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
May 16, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

[edit] Real Sex Olympics

2012 will see the Games of the XXX Olympiad, the Sex Olympics come true?
boffy_b July 8, 2005 09:10 (UTC)

[edit] Passing GA

This was one of the oldest noms on the pile, so I decided to check it out.

This passes. It's well-sourced enough (though I would like to see more in the production history) and about as comprehensive as it could be (I'd like to see this now).

I would recommend some improvements in the prose. "Ironically" has to go; we let readers decide that even if it is rather obvious. "Self-appointed moral watchdog" may be literally true but is pejorative, and hence POV, in effect; I would substitute something like "television decency campaigner". In the intro, "anticipated" should replace "predicted".

It would be nice to see more pictures, but after reading the article I understand why they may be difficult to get. Good use of the pull-quote template as a substitute. Daniel Case 04:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Sweeps (Pass)

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, MASEM 20:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)