Talk:The Wild

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (nations and regions): Canadian cinema task force

Contents 1 Picture Reqripoff?uest 2 Add this picture 3 "Harsh thoughts?" 4 Production Timeline 5 Lots of errors and confusion 6 Not in canon because... 7 Urban Legand 8 Duke And Eze 9 Promotional Efforts 10 Inaccuracies 11 Bridget the Giraffe 12 Inaccuracies Section 13 Plot summary 14 Fair use rationale for Image:The wild.jpg

[edit] Picture Reqripoff?uest

If someone could please post the picture with Samson and his friends in the car looking at New York here, that would be great. I think that would be a great edit to the article.

[edit] Add this picture

Someone please add that picture of Samson and his pals looking at new york from that car? Thanks.

[edit] "Harsh thoughts?"

How is the quote from movies.com (Disney's OWN website) "harsh thoughts"? The statement seems hardly harsh at all. In fact, it seems pretty much like a variation of every movie pitch ever made. And who are these "Others"? Are they from an island somewhere?

[edit] Production Timeline

It's pretty much common knowledge in the film industry that Madagascar went into production after The Wild. Can someone please update this section with more links like this: http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=416a2a1b-6e47-4310-9613-23e591475939&k=3248 [ty]

more likely, indeed: animation is far smoother and characters are no mere cubes or cylinders, but round and crisp. These things take a lot more time to render properly. The only original and creative feature film so far from Dreamworks is Shreck, but it rips from the Grim Brothers, H.C.Andersen and a few others rather than Disney...

it sucks when competition means similar products in movies. It's ok with shoes and clothes, but with movies and any storytelling media, it really sucks...

It also sucks when the movie that Dreamworks ripped off from Disney is recieved better and made more money. IMO, I like the animation of Madagascar better than that of The Wild,as well as the story and general presentation. Emerald 18:39, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lots of errors and confusion

I just read some of the article, and noticed lots of errors. Down at the bottom, there are a few blatantly misspelled words in the Box Office section, plus "it's" used for possession. Also, the Soundtrack section makes almost no sense grammatically and generally.

If you're savvy enough to know how to post in the discussion page, you're able to correct such errors on the main page. I'll be doing a few post-haste, but suggest you do the same should you note errors in the future. Student Driver 16:55, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Not in canon because...

Why isn't this movie in the Disney animated features canon?? It appears to meet all the criteria. Georgia guy 21:17, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Because this was not made by Disney but by C.O.R.E Animation studios and is therefore only distributed by Disney so not going into the canon like Disney's Valiant and other Chicken Little and Snow White, etc. which were made by Disney.

This is NOT a Disney movie. This film is distributed by Disney, but Disney had nothing else to do with it. Many other films, like Valiant, Pokemon 4, Spirited Away, Howl's Moving Castle, etc, etc, etc, would all be "Disney films" if the criteria would be if Disney distributed them. But that is not the rule!!!! Learn. Disney did not make The Wild, and it is not a Disney film. Casey14 23:21, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

The dvd box argues otherwize, on the back of mine it says "Disney's 46th ainmated classic".

all the previsous 45 classics hav it.

The Director is Steve "Spaz" Williams not Steve Wiliam. The correct link to eg. imdb. would be [1] He's canadian and a legend ILM animator, best know for his work at Jurassic Park, Abyss and Terminator2.

[edit] Urban Legand

The alligators in the sewer are an urban legend. There are no alligators in New York's or any other city's sewers. That might not have much to do with the movie, but I thought it would be cool to bring it up.

[edit] Duke And Eze

Who's the hippopotamus and who's the kangaroo? Dora Nichov 23:24, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Promotional Efforts

The article mentions a scant handful of promotional efforts from a few manufacturers and publishers. What counts as a promotinoal effort? 3M did character adhesive bandages (under the Nexcare brand) in multiple packages featuring characters from the film, and decorated PoP displays were available before Christmas 2005. Is this "promotional" or merely "licensed"? Student Driver 16:58, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Inaccuracies

This list is pointless. Surely a more important inaccuracy is 'Animals can't really talk'. 81.136.125.120 12:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

STOP, NOW! "Animals can't talk" really is too nitpicky. You...! Even babies know that animals (other than humans) can't talk in human languages. Oh, you think someone doesn't? Dora Nichov 12:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

"The Koala has a British accent". Australians talk with a similar accent. 67.188.172.165 17:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

No they don't. The Sky May Be 07:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

The list is pointless!! Some of the things mentioned are not accurate aswell and do not go into enough detail. Also, Who cares if it is inaccurate!? It's a childrens comedy animation by Disney. What do you expect?

What isn't accurate? Dora Nichov 00:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bridget the Giraffe

"She is perfect of being physical." What does this mean...? --60.229.153.165 08:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

If you see something that does not make sense, go ahead and edit it to make it right. Wikipedia is founded on every user being involved in the creation of this encyclopedia.

[edit] Inaccuracies Section

I removed the Inaccuracies section. This film is not meant to educate (as opposed to, say, a movie documenting a historical event or a documentary). Any film portraying TALKING ANIMALS is likely to be zoologically inaccurate.

STOP, NOW! "Animals can't talk" really is too nitpicky. You...! Even babies know that animals (other than humans) can't talk in human languages. Oh, you think someone doesn't? Dora Nichov 05:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Plot summary

I've trimmed the exceedingly long plot summary, which had been tagged as such since July, 2007, using a briefer summary from an earlier revision [2]. --Tony Sidaway 14:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:The wild.jpg

Image:The wild.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)