Talk:The Wide, Wide World
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class. | ||
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by the 19th century task force. (with unknown importance) | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
[edit] Copyright issues
I am reinstating all deleted material as what was listed as "copyright infringement" from bleckblog.org/wide was in fact written by myself. I have left a note on bleckglog.org/wide to verify this.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tao of tyler (talk • contribs)
- Please note that the original text was not even attributed, while the site has a copyright notice, so how should one know? Moreover, reducing the text and removing at least avoided a speedy deletion with the content remining in the edit histry, so I wouldn't call it improper.--Tikiwont 09:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- I understand, simple mistake to make. Is the stamp I left on bleckblog.org/lit enough to verify that this was our content enough to verify? If it isnt, Id be willing to delete the content on bleckblog.org/lit first. Also inform me if the sources have not been done properly. I had a tricky time getting the notes to work, and any help is appreciated.--Tao of tyler 09:31, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- I saw you cleaned up the notes, thanks for your help. Again, if theres anything additional I need to do to verify, please inform me. I dont want to have to go through and put that all up again. --Tao of tyler 09:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- I understand, simple mistake to make. Is the stamp I left on bleckblog.org/lit enough to verify that this was our content enough to verify? If it isnt, Id be willing to delete the content on bleckblog.org/lit first. Also inform me if the sources have not been done properly. I had a tricky time getting the notes to work, and any help is appreciated.--Tao of tyler 09:31, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well, actually sorry if I've bitten you. I now found a less intimidating message for such a case (Template:Nothanks) and a better variant for your site might be: "We, (name), are the authors of this article, (article name), and we release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." As this is now also documented here on the talk page, it should be fine, and there is no reason to delete content from the blog. --Tikiwont 09:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- No problem, you were just doing your job. Thanks for your help on everything. The message has been added to bleckblog.org/lit/wide permitting use. --Tao of tyler 19:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] References
I've removed the book itself, since it is not a reference and created one web citaion. You can then sue this template template:web cite other ones, nut I have doubst about the e-notes ref. --Tikiwont 10:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
