Talk:The Twenty-Seven Points

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.


According to The Fall Online gigography:

"October(?) 1990 The Roxanne, Tel Aviv, Israel

No tape exists? At least some of it appears on The 27 Points, and Rona, who went to the gig, thinks it was in October."

So the date given for Hi-Tension Line in the main body of the text appears to be wrong...as is the assertion on the record itself that the tracks come from the years 1992-1995. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.202.166.8 (talk) 08:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

  • The "Tel Aviv 92" is actually part of the title as given on the sleeve. As with several Fall live releases, it is widely accepted amongst the fan community that some information is inaccurate or incomplete but that doesn't mean we can start changing track titles. It is also possible that "Rona" is wrong... Ac@osr (talk) 18:17, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes, but the Tel Aviv 92 bit is crossed out, and the track listings on subsequent CDs has always said simply Hi-Tension Line (itself a change from the original title of this record, of course). And, the fact that the Leeds bit of the Outro track is crossed out is noted in the main article, so I don't think that Tel Aviv 92 can really be said to be part of the song title. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.16.96.192 (talk) 20:00, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

  • I haven't seen the re-release so I can't comment on that but it's still possible the corresponant is wrong. I'm certainly not changing the article but if you want to note the possible inaccuracy, feel free. Ac@osr (talk) 22:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)