Talk:The Traitor and the Jew
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I removed the links and quotes re the advocacy group, Vigile net which also included someone's personal "translation" from French to English of criticisms.
I also removed a "fact" notice that somebody inserted in a section that is a quote from the book.
Is an Wikipedia editor's own "translation" of a French language article acceptable aas a reliable source? J Martin81 23:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Article by Gary Caldwell not Original Research
The criticism made by Gary Caldwell in the article "The Sins of the Abbé Groulx", published in Literary Review of Canada, volume 3, issue 7, July-August 1994, pages 17 to 23 is NOT original research. The removal of this material by J Martin81 is not justified as it is properly referenced. If the expression "asserted in essence" poses a problem, it can be changed for something else. I will revert to my last version unless serious objections are raised. -- Mathieugp 23:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikiganda of Finkelsteinist Ilk
The section "Criticism by Other Academics" appears to be little more than Finkelstienism, a neolism named after its foremost practitioner, Norman Finkelstein, a professional anti-Semite of Jewish ancestry. Finkelsteinism is the practice of obscuring an ideological challenge by drowning it in minor footnote challenges and personal attacks against the author.
Ultimately it doesn't matter whether a quote was on this page or that, or that it was from an earliler source, what matters is the basic thesis, that a revered Quebec nationalist ideologist was a vicious anti-Semitic racist and that the nationalists have failed to denounce him. All else is smokescreen.68.5.64.178 00:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:EDelisleBookcover.jpg
Image:EDelisleBookcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)