Talk:The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. A possibility for American films from before 1964 would be a screenshot from the trailer, as these are now in the public domain. Please make sure fair use is properly observed, or the image will be removed. See WP:Films MOS for image guidelines and assistance in uploading.

"Costume

The costumes in this version were like the ones that you would have also seen in the actual stage plays. The setting the same. But the costume tights were so tight that the behind was tightened and it looked as if they were naked in some shots.

[edit] Love Scene

It isn't clear in the play whether the couple have sex or not. There is a scene where the two are having sex in the 1968 movie, but the play says they only enter. Romeo gets out of bed in the nude (explicit nudity shown in the 1968 version) and he opens the curtain. His butt is shown for a short period of time. He soon gets back in bed and has sex with Juliet. Juliet's chest is eventually shown for a split second. The scene in the 1968 adaption was not meant to be sexual. It Instead it was meant to be a romantic work of art and they were married during that scene The 1968 film is however rated PG and once was G. It was rerated PG before the existence of PG-13. The 1968 version also got a pause 13+ rating on commonsense media. The same thing happens in this, except only his chest and body, not his bottom, are shown. These two versions verify that supposedly they did have sex, but cannot be verified.

As explained earlier, you can only see his stomach up before he pulls the tight pants on.

[edit]"


What is this shit? Why does this article about the 192 version ONLY discuss the 1968 version? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.86.24.145 (talk) 01:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)



[[ == == ==

hijo putaª!!!

Q MIERDA!!! UDS VIERON "ROMEO + JULIET", COMO SE LE OCURREN USAR ARMAS Y Q EL TIPO DI CAPRIO DE LA tapa tenga REMERA JAWAIANA!!!!! LA CHICA TIENE VESTIDO CON ALAS!!! ESTARAN DEL TOMATE??? SU PELI: ES GUAACHO MEN!! ES DECIR: GOOD! AUNQ NO LA VCI JAJAJ == == ==]]


"the original Romeo and Juliet by Franco Zeffirelli." This is a joke, right?