Talk:The Sneetches and Other Stories
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
Possible sourse for sneeches story
The sneetches follows the book Black No More I've never seen a link between them written about but it seems apparent. If someone knows more or can link them non coincidently I think it might be reasonable to do so. 65.25.155.252 02:43, 10 March 2006 (UTC)dan
link:
Tom Harrison Talk 02:36, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Split
Should this article be split? It seems that the Sneetches is significant enough to deserve it's own article.
[edit] King Christian
Is there any evidence that the Star-bellied Sneetches story was related to King Christian's (of Denmark) refusal to require Danish Jews to wear stars? King Christian also supposedly wore a star, himself, to demonstrate his solidarity with his Jewish citizens. I didn't find anything about this in Wikipedia, but it's intriguing as potential encyclopedia material. Appraiser 18:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
i really liked the sneetche that funny when the cat took all they money funny honey
[edit] Too Many Daves
I merged the article for "Too Many Daves" into this one, though honestly since there was nothing in that article that wasn't in this one (and much less, to boot), I guess it's just more of a redirect than anything else. Eatcacti 07:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Racial Discrimination
I loved that book as a child and as a parent. I found it interesting that the author(s) of this article focussed on the messages about consumerism, but on the subject of racial discrimination say "there may be deeper connotations". I found it interesting because when I read it, it was the racial discrimination that I thought the main theme, and consumerism the secondary one. I'm not changing anything in the article. I just wanted to comment, but it does seem like the discrimination angle could be elevated in emphasis. (P.S. I'm a white male, so it's not like I saw this because discrimination was my cross to bear or anything like that - it just seemed obvious to me.)
P.P.S. The above was my comment - I forgot to log in —Preceding unsigned comment added by Synaptidude (talk • contribs) 19:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
