Talk:The Slave Community

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Featured article star The Slave Community is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do.
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on August 14, 2007.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.
Featured article FA
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a group devoted to the the study, and improvement of Wikipedia articles on the subject, of History. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] New article

Just transferred this article from my sandbox to this namespace, been working on it for about a week. Dmoon1 08:38, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure I buy the notion that this was one of the first books (historical biographies) told from the point of view of a slave, if it was published in the 1970s. Am I misunderstanding the claim? Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 03:08, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I think you are. It was one of the first history books that offers an interpretation of the history of slavery using mostly sources written by slaves. There were numerous autobiographies written in the 19th century by runaway slaves, and these are what The Slave Community is based on. The fugitive slave narratives are not considered histories. Up until the 1970s, history was interpreted using mostly sources written by white slaveowners. The result was an unbalanced interpretation of history that only favored the voices and opinions of those who owned slaves, not the slaves themselves. Dmoon1 03:14, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Okay, it's a little clearer now - I'm still curious what the "white slaveowner counterparts" to Frederick Douglass and such were...purely from a "common sense" POV, it seems like the average person today can think of 3-4 slvaery books written by slaves/ex-slaves, but I doubt any of them could name one written by a plantation owner. What's the "source" (unrelated to this publishers' claims) that books before the 70s used "white" slaveowner narratives? Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 09:38, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Well, these aren't the publisher's claims, it historiographic fact (read the section on the historiographical background). The most influential studies of slavery prior to the 1970s were based on white sources, i.e., plantation records; letters, diaries, and journals written by slaveowners; and southern periodicals such as DeBow's Review. Dmoon1 14:59, 16 August 2007 (UTC)