Talk:The Sight (Warriors)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on May 15, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 2 January 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Fantasy task force. (with unknown importance) | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Warriors, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Warriors universe. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-priority on the priority scale. |
|
Article Grading: |
|
|
WikiProject Warriors tasks you can do:
|
|
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Cats.
This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. |
|
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. | |
Contents |
[edit] Holly, Lion, Jaypaws eyes
I just noticed, why's the cover for The Sight have the kits with all amber eyes? On the copy I've got they're what their eye colors really are. I wonder why they've changed it...? (Nyctra 15:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC))
-
- Well, there are two different covers. One has the correct eye colors while one has a different one.Nightflower 22:06, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, could someone change it to the correct cover? I don't know how to...205.121.201.180 17:52, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- If this is the first edition cover then you have to leave it as is. If you want to have the other cover you could add in a sentence or two about it, but it's really unecisary to have both the covers or to change them. Bella Swan(Talk!) 17:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Under 'Trivia'
A play has been released on warriorcats.com that 'insinuates' that *gasp* Leafpool was pregnent and that one of the three kits may be her's NOT Squirrelflight's! I don't know if I should put up anything about it here or not ~Rainclaw (NOT Rainpaw) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.247.1.36 (talk) 21:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Nothing has ever pointed towards the play as being canon, so we have chosen not to add information from it, because it just seems so unlikely, and it hasn't been confirmed to have actually occured.
- Besides that, it's not relevant to this page anyways. --~|ET|~(Talk|Contribs) 21:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:PowerofThreebook1.jpg
Image:PowerofThreebook1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Plot summary seems to be POV-ed
...And another question: why are there two story summaries in the article?? Extremely perplexing.... ♣ Bishop Tutu Chat wit' me § Contributions ♣ 00:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
So do you want the 'Summary' section deleted? It doesn't add much to the article. Shrewpelt (talk) 03:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WAY TOO LONG.
The article is too long, and the plot summary looks like it's been taken directly from the inside cover of the book.
I'll cut down when I get home...IceUnshattered (talk) 14:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
