Talk:The Return of Jafar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As much as I generally like this movie now, it deserves more than nothing but a character list. Perhaps I'll give it some TLC later... that is, if no one else steps up to the plate. --Sparky the Seventh Chaos 08:05, Jul 13, 2004 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Question about the movie
In the scene in which Jafar and the Genie fight, is the Genie overpowered because he is free and his powers have been weakened somewhat, or is it because in the previous movie, Jafar wisehd to be the "most powerful" genie?
- Well, yes I suppose it's because of that. Nobody wished him freedom, so that explains why he isn't free yet. And since he is a genie his main weakness is destroyed lamp. TheBlazikenMaster 07:33, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Actually, it's because Genie's powers were vastly weakened by his release from the lamp. As he says when he returns from his trip, his powers "aren't what they used to be", and that they're now just "semi-phenomenal, nearly cosmic". -NerdMaster 8th June 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by NerdMaster15 (talk • contribs) 08:08, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Thereturnofjafar.jpg
Image:Thereturnofjafar.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Plot summary
I've restored the tag concerning the overlong plot summary. When it was tagged on 14 January, the plot summary was just over 1250 words in length. Just a month later, it's grown to just shy of 1400 words, and the tag has been removed. The problem remains. --Tony 21:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Reaction
The movie garnered a 22% rating on Rotten Tomatoes... Cool, I never knew Rotten Tomatoes was a popular website in 1994! :-) The Siskel and Ebert thumbs up review is true though, you can see it at their website. 207.179.154.164 (talk) 00:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)