Talk:The Professionals (TV series)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
An appropriate infobox needs to be added to this article, or the current infobox needs to be updated. |
Contents |
[edit] Rumours
I removed this addition:-
- It is rumored that it wasn't until someone pointed out to him that royalties that would go to the wife of the by-then deceased Gordon Jackson, would considerably help her out financially, that Shaw finally relented.[citation needed]
Maybe I misunderstood the person's use of {{fact}}, but it sounds like they added something when they seriously doubted it themselves. There's nothing wrong with adding rumours, if they're widespread and their status is made clear. OTOH, it has to be verifiable that the rumour exists (regardless of its truthfulness) and is reasonably widespread. So, is it the existence of the rumour that's in dispute, or the fact itself? Fourohfour 13:04, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- It's fair enough that is was removed, as the way in which I presented it was a little dodgy. But I heard it mentioned on a documentary about the series, and can't for the life of me place which one. I was hoping that someone else could. Maybe it can be re-added if someone can recall where it was exactly. =) (forgot to sign! not my day, is it!) Jay Firestorm 15:23, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oh well, I see what you're saying. Thanks anyway! Fourohfour 13:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- It's fair enough that is was removed, as the way in which I presented it was a little dodgy. But I heard it mentioned on a documentary about the series, and can't for the life of me place which one. I was hoping that someone else could. Maybe it can be re-added if someone can recall where it was exactly. =) (forgot to sign! not my day, is it!) Jay Firestorm 15:23, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Guns section
From a technical stand point (as anyone who knows anything about firearms will know), the guns section made no sense, so I've removed it. -- Pauric (talk-contributions) 21:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Written by somebody in CI5?
There's a bit of within-fictional-universe perspective here, especially in the character bios. Following copied from Talk:Obi-Wan Kenobi:
- Rewrite with an out-of-universe perspective Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction)Nankai 20:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Doylecowleybodie.jpg
Image:Doylecowleybodie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 08:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
