Talk:The Paperboys
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Paperboys/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
- "their music has been called versatile, with a wide range" - this is quite broad, can you say anything more specific?
-
- This passage was a summary for lead from the passages here and here. I thought it was alright to summarize into the lead like this? Based on that, and expanding and clarifying it like this, how does that look? rootology (T)
-
- It looks much better now, the original wasn't really saying anything IMO... Fine now. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 07:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- "An award-winning band, their first three studio albums have received Juno Award nominations" - the "an award-winning band" isn't really necessary considering what you say next...
- "the Paperboys have extensively toured" - should the T in the Paperboys be capitalised?
- "The Paperboys released their first studio album, Late as Usual, in 1995, which with their next albums Molinos in 1998 and Postcards in 2001 have all received Juno Award nominations, with Molinos winning in the Roots and Traditional Album of the Year category." - reword please, this is choppy and all over the place
-
- OK, how does this revision look? The Paperboys#Recording and performance history rootology (T) 03:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- "In reviews for Molinos, it was noted..." - you only cite one review, so the plural shouldn't be used
- Is there very little information about the band out there? The history information seems a bit lacking...
- Newspapers/magazines/etc. in references need italics (MOS:ITALICS)
- "In music reviews, Tom Landa's songwriting has been cited as world-class" - cite more reviews or keep it singular, and say who called it world class
Please leave a note on my talk page when you're done with these comments. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 11:31, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- All set on all points (I hope) and note left for you. Thanks. :) rootology (T) 03:27, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Alright, I think I'm out of sources that aren't behind pay walls now. How does it look? rootology (T) 06:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Awesome, all else looks good, so passing. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 07:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
This GAN has passed, and this is now a good article! If you found this review helpful, please consider helping out a fellow editor by reviewing another good article nomination. Help and advice on how to do so is available at Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles, and you can ask for the help of a GAN mentor, if you wish.
Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 07:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Categories: Wikipedia good articles | Wikipedia CD Selection-GAs | GA-Class Good articles | Arts good articles | Wikipedia Did you know articles | Biography articles of living people | Biography articles without listas parameter | Musicians work group articles | GA-Class biography (musicians) articles | Low-priority biography (musicians) articles | GA-Class biography articles | WikiProject Canadian music articles | GA-Class Canadian music articles | Low-importance Canadian music articles | GA-Class Canada-related articles | Low-importance Canada-related articles