Talk:The Lie: Evolution
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
 |
This article is supported by the Intelligent design WikiProject.
This project provides a central approach to Intelligent design-related subjects on Wikipedia. |
||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on July 17, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 |
This article was nominated for deletion in the past. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Thanks for helping out with the article people! Any help in the ariticle would be appreciated and please don't mess it up just because you don't like Christianity! --Caleb09 14:57, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
I support Christianity but not this page. The book cited adds nothing to the evolution debate that has not been said decades earlier. The page Lie Evolution should be deleted as non-notable. Please do not mess up this comment just because you want to censor criticism.66.109.201.214 04:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- What is wrong with having this page? This is a real book isn't it? The point of the article isn't to add anything new to the evolution debate, the point is to relay information about the book. If you think the book is no good, find some sources that agree with you, add something to the article and then cite the sources.--Wikidan81 20:53, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Feeble page. Better as a footnote to the article on the topic. Still, if we must have it it is now spelled correctly. Midgley 09:31, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:51, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Potential Improvement?
A quick Google Books search (http://books.google.com/books?client=firefox-a&q=%22The+Lie:+Evolution%22&um=1&lr=&sa=N&start=20) produced 37 results, most of which refer to this book. Perhaps someone knowledgeable about the book and subject matter can work some in as references to establish greater notability for this work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.230.132.130 (talk) 11:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
