Talk:The Liberator (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move --Lox (t,c) 14:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

• The Liberator (magazine) → The Liberator (magazine) — "United States magazine" seems rather excessive to me. I understand that there is a UK magazine by the name, Liberator, but wouldn't it be incorrect to address The Liberator as Liberator (and visa versa)? — Mirlen 16:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

• Support I can't see why The Liberator (magazine) and Liberator (magazine) can't coexist. I suggest placing something like this at the top of the moved article: "For the UK radical magazine see Liberator (magazine). For other uses of "Liberator", see Liberator." and visa-versa --Lox (t,c) 13:16, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.