Talk:The Last Picture Show

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.

Dropped from second para. after "Bogdanovich:

"who had built a reputation as a film critic before directing this, his first feature film."

Incorrect: Bogdanovich's first feature was Targets. -(unsigned)

The better solution is to fix the statement rather than remove all mention of the fact that Bogdanovich was a film critic. - Nunh-huh 21:35, 1 May 2004 (UTC)

OK, will revise. Ellsworth 21:49, 1 May 2004 (UTC)

Actually, the revision is fine. Ellsworth 21:49, 1 May 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Name of Movie Theater

The statement "...Sam the Lion, owner of the eponymous movie theater..." is an incorrect statement. The name of the theater in the book and the movie is the Royal. It couldn't be eponymous unless the actual name of the theater was The Last Picture Show. The title of the movie (and the book for that matter) refers to the final showing of a movie at the theater before it shuts down symbollically referencing the death of Sam the Lion and the dying town itself. Someone on this site is in love with the word eponymous because I see it used every chance they get on several entries. I guess it's one of those words that makes the user feel intelligent like the use of the word "esoteric".

[edit] Camera angles

The statement about camera angles is not correct. For example toward the end of the fight scene with the beer bottle, there is an overhead shot.

I caught that, too. I will change that line. Rsmoore 16:45, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Plot and/or summary?

Hey, could someone take the time to add a summary, I was just skimming through this and I noticed there wasn't a plot anywhere in the article. Ace Fighter 07:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Public controversy?

The back of the dvd says it was released "to critical acclaim and public controvesry." Someone should find out what that controversy was and include it in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.89.173 (talk) 04:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:MPW-5271.jpg

Image:MPW-5271.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)