Talk:The Johns Hopkins News-Letter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Johns Hopkins News-Letter is part of WikiProject Maryland, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Maryland.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Published since 1896, it is the oldest continuously-published college newspaper in the nation.

I'm afraid that's incorrect. I go to a college where the newspaper was created in 1881, and I'm sure many more colleges have older newspapers than that. The statement in the article needs to be fixed. (Notorious4life 05:47, 14 April 2006 (UTC))
The statement is a direct quote from Wikipedia's own, very thoroughly-edited entry on the Johns Hopkins University, under the section on Student Publications. It is true that there are older student newspapers, but the caveat "continuously-published" is added, as it is in various other places to which you will find references to the News-Letter, because many college newspapers have seen interruptions or changes to how they publish. The News-Letter has, as far as records can prove, never experienced such an interruption.(nym2886 1:51, 14 April 2006 (EST))
Please refer to Harvard's own newspaper, Harvard Crimson, which also makes the same clam here, when is states "The Harvard Crimson was one of many college newspapers founded shortly after the Civil War and describes itself as "the nation's oldest continuously published daily college newspaper." (Notorious4life 05:57, 14 April 2006 (UTC))
To settle this dispute, the statement has been modified to say "one of" the oldest continuously-published college newspapers in the nation.

Is it necessary to display the names of the editors of this newspaper?

I don't think so... and I'm one of them. I realize it's impossible to verify that though, so just take it as a vote against including them.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Gatehouse.jpg

Image:Gatehouse.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)