Talk:The Hustler (novel)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class. | ||
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article needs an infobox template! - see Novels InfoboxCode or Short Story InfoboxCode for a pattern | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cue sports, a project to improve Wikipedia's coverage of pool, carom billiards and other cue sports. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
[edit] Spoilers & neutrality
Resolved.Someone who knows how should put a spoiler disclaimer on this page as it gives away the plot of the movie. [-anon.]
- Somebody has done so.... how do you remove the 'neutrality' warning? [--anonymous]
- The neutrality warning belongs there until that last part of the article is either re-written or removed. What's currently there is a review (eg "The dialog is frought with cracks and emptiness." - and I think "frought" is the wrong word anyway). I'm sure it's very good, but it's not remotely encyclopaedic. --Cardinal Wurzel 17:32, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Marking this topic resolved, as all of the issues raised have been long since dealt with. PS: The word someone was looking for was "fraught". — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 11:25, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- The neutrality warning belongs there until that last part of the article is either re-written or removed. What's currently there is a review (eg "The dialog is frought with cracks and emptiness." - and I think "frought" is the wrong word anyway). I'm sure it's very good, but it's not remotely encyclopaedic. --Cardinal Wurzel 17:32, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
