Talk:The Hottie and the Nottie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film. Article upgrading needed: You can help! WP:IA   Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions for Films Note that instructions for articles on other types of film topics within the scope of WikiProject Films are currently under development. To contribute in upgrading this stub article to Start class, the following requirements must be met: Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.) Film infobox ({{infobox film}}) Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image. Non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible, but if used should include a detailed fair use rationale. (An image is not required for start class if unavailable.) Plot summary Include cast and crew information. At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, themes, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.) Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))  Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF, WP:WAF Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to Start class and this template will be removed automatically.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

Paris..... uhhhhh! Wow! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.114.122.156 (talk) 03:25, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Removed "It is rumored that shooting had to be stopped several times due to unexplained sightings of Jesus begging cast and crew to stop filming and for the taped footage to be destroyed." - I'm assuming it was vandalism, besides,I saw nothing on the Jesus page about this... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.49.177.237 (talk) 09:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Haha that's the funniest shit ever. 71.108.27.205 (talk) 01:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Umm, is it just me, or is this article, the "Synopsis" in particular, not really in like with the way Wikipedia is supposed to write its articles? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vor'Cha (talk • contribs) 08:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

The story part needs extreme work, but I'm not stupid enough to go anywhere near this film. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.232.240.76 (talk) 18:56, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

This movie does not deserve to have an article on Wikipedia. I am surprised to see many decent movies having no Wikipedia mentionings. -165.21.155.116 (talk) 14:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

The fact that this movie is such a notorious failure makes it novel for wikipedia. 128.114.60.220 (talk) 18:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

I move for deletion, based on the premise that we must, at long last, have a sense of decency. MWShort (talk) 18:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

So we delete things we don't like, rather than acknowledge their historical relevance? This film had a huge amount of press and set its place in history. So we just pretend it didn't exist? If other films aren't here, they probably just haven't been entered. Unless we are going decide on personal tastes. In that case, I don't like Lima Beans. Let's delete them from the encyclopedia?Bsteph1 (talk) 05:14, 14 April 2008 (UTC)