Talk:The Heralds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	The Heralds was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
	An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on August 11, 2006.
Article milestones Date Process Result December 5, 2006 Good article nominee Listed March 28, 2008 Good article reassessment Delisted Current Status: Delisted good article

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

Heraldry and Vexillology WikiProject Heraldry and Vexillology Portal The Heralds is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. (FAQ). WikiProject Novels  Literature Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. ??? This article has not yet received a rating. Assessment comments This article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. WikiProject Books Books Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Contents 1 Kind Hearts and Coronets 2 GA Pass 3 Cecil Gascoigne 4 GA Sweeps

[edit] Kind Hearts and Coronets

I'd never heard of this movie before this bit was added to the article. Any idea if the general idea was pilfered by Killick, or if it is merely a coincidence?--dave-- 18:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA Pass

This article meets the criteria for a GA, so I passed it. Itcould use a bit more analysis from book reviews (if any exist) in reputable sources, but it is a good article on an interesting book.--Eva ^bd 21:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cecil Gascoigne

The character name "Cecil Gascoigne" may be a play on the family name of the Marquesses of Salisbury, Gascoyne-Cecil. The Marquesses were fairly well known when the book was written, the Third Marquess being the Prime Minister several times and his son being a Minister in the 1950's.

--J. J. in PA 22:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC)J. J. in PA

[edit] GA Sweeps

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed.

• Fundamentally, the major issue here is that there are no inline citations and no references to reliable external sources.
• In addition, the article has no information on reception, development, beackground etc.

I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made and issues are being addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 12:53, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, no work done, not close, this has to be delisted.--Jackyd101 (talk) 01:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)