Talk:The Hebrew Hammer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Judaism Portal The Hebrew Hammer is part of WikiProject Judaism, a project to improve all articles related to Judaism. If you would like to help improve this and other articles related to the subject, consider joining the project. All interested editors are welcome. This template adds articles to Category:WikiProject Judaism articles.
Project Judaism To-do: edit purge watch Here are some tasks you can do: Requests: Jewish and Biblical Units of Measurement or some such name, to include material of Ancient Hebrew units of measurement but also Talmudic units and use in Halacha (a la the Hebrew Wikipedia article he:מידות ומשקלות תורניים) Collaboration of the week { Cleanup: Jewish mythology - needs to be rewritten to be inline with our other mythology articles. Expand: Yom Ha'atzmaut - quite short for an article of such importance Wikiversity: School of Jewish Studies. Part of the new open content university, Wikiversity. Stubs: Category:Judaism stubs, Category:Tanakh stubs, Category:Synagogue stubs Update: Portal:Judaism is WikiProject Judaism's frequently updated portal. You can help make this the best portal on Wikipedia. Look at the talk page to see how you can help. Template loop detected: Template:WikiProject Judaism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

Contents 1 Bootleg copys of Its a Wonderfull Life? 2 Sequel Information 3 Stereotype Issuses 4 Controversy?

[edit] Bootleg copys of Its a Wonderfull Life?

Shouldent we point out the sheer absurdity of a bootleg copy of Its a Wonderfull Life? The only reason anyone's ever even heard of the movie, much less seen it is because its in the public domain, i.e. the copyrights expired. Back when the movie was made, you got x amount of time for something to remain copyrighted, then you had to apply for extensions. After a little while, they forgot to get an extension, so the movie went into the public domain and T.V. stations started showing it. Since pretty much by definition you cant have something bootleged that was legaly made, saying that its bootleged was pretty absurd. Eds01 01:27, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Hence, the funny. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.9.17 (talk)

It's A Wonderful Life was never in the public domain. (Ibaranoff24 21:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC))

[edit] Sequel Information

Identified as completely inaccurate and deleted.

Source? There's mention of the sequel in a few other articles, but I don't want to delete it without knowing that this news is indeed false. Jklharris (talk) 09:40, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stereotype Issuses

Does this movie show stereotypes? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.168.88.100 (talk) 18:50, 12 March 2007 (UTC).

This movie is a cluster of stereotypes, that's the whole point. --Joffeloff 21:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Controversy?

A minor thing, but is a "controversy" section necessary here, when all we can apparently say is that there was no controversy?